On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 09:23 -0500, Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > On Dec 5, 2005, at 9:04 AM, Sebastian Hammer wrote: > > > SRW doesn't have a lot of traction -- the SOAP substrate is inherently > > more complex, and frankly it is non-trivial to produce a WSDL that can > > be ingested by any SOAP engine *and* produce interoperable code.
> Yes. Maybe the LoC will apply that lesson elsewhere and dump XML > Schema ;-) I wouldn't like to say that Xml Schema "doesn't have a lot of traction" ;) Rob -- Dr Robert Sanderson Dept of Computer Science, University of Liverpool Home: http://www.csc.liv.ac.uk/~azaroth/ Cheshire: http://www.cheshire3.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
