On Jan 14, 2006, at 9:54 AM, CPHennessy wrote:
However the two examples I have for the cite info differ a bit:
OK, I just looked at this. David's example is this:
<text:bibliography-mark text:id="bib2">
<cite:citation>
<cite:citation-source>
<cite:biblioref cite:key="Thrift1990a"/>
</cite:citation-source>
<cite:citation-body>
<text:note text:id="ftn2" text:note-class="footnote">
<text:note-citation>3</text:note-citation>
<text:note-body>
<text:p text:style-name="Footnote">Nigel Thrift, For a New
Regional
Geography 1</text:p>
</text:note-body>
</text:note>
</cite:citation-body>
</cite:citation>
</text:bibliography-mark>
Yes, the text:bibliography-mark element shouldn't be there (it's
redundant).
Also, I'm a little confused about what the text:id attribute does
there. I'm still wondering if we're missing some way to tag a node with
an id for processing (to insert the formatted citation in the correct
place; e.g. the first/subsequent issue and so forth). Hopefully that
can happen outside of the cite: XML.
Bruce
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
