On Sat January 14 2006 16:50, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2006, at 9:54 AM, CPHennessy wrote:
> > However the two examples I have for the cite info differ a bit:
>
> OK, I just looked at this. David's example is this:
>
> <text:bibliography-mark text:id="bib2">
> <cite:citation>
> <cite:citation-source>
> <cite:biblioref cite:key="Thrift1990a"/>
> </cite:citation-source>
> <cite:citation-body>
> <text:note text:id="ftn2" text:note-class="footnote">
> <text:note-citation>3</text:note-citation>
> <text:note-body>
> <text:p text:style-name="Footnote">Nigel Thrift, For a New
> Regional
> Geography 1</text:p>
> </text:note-body>
> </text:note>
> </cite:citation-body>
> </cite:citation>
> </text:bibliography-mark>
>
> Yes, the text:bibliography-mark element shouldn't be there (it's
> redundant).
Ok, thanks.
> Also, I'm a little confused about what the text:id attribute does
> there. I'm still wondering if we're missing some way to tag a node with
> an id for processing (to insert the formatted citation in the correct
> place; e.g. the first/subsequent issue and so forth). Hopefully that
> can happen outside of the cite: XML.
Another item to consider is backward compatability. Presumably when an ODF
doc is written with the new "cite" elements the old biblio elements should
also be written. I am not sure if this would mean that it is simply enclosed
within the <cite:citation> somewhere.
Not sure of you use IRC, but you can sometimes find me on #openoffice.org on
freenode as cph. I'll be on-line tomorrow for some time.
--
CPH : openoffice.org contributor
Maybe your question has been answered already?
http://user-faq.openoffice.org/#FAQ
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
