On Sunday 15 January 2006 3:50 am, Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > On Jan 14, 2006, at 9:54 AM, CPHennessy wrote: > > However the two examples I have for the cite info differ a bit:
> > Yes, the text:bibliography-mark element shouldn't be there (it's > redundant). I was not sure if it needs to there or not. It depends were we put the old style citation and table entries for backwards compatability - under text:bibliography-mark or the new cite marks. > Also, I'm a little confused about what the text:id attribute does > there. I'm still wondering if we're missing some way to tag a node with > an id for processing (to insert the formatted citation in the correct > place; e.g. the first/subsequent issue and so forth). Hopefully that > can happen outside of the cite: XML. I have just done some research and have found the 'text:id' tag is explained explained in the 'Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) 1.0' document. There ar quite a few mentions eg. " A text:id attribute to allow the start and end elements to be matched." p141 or " In this situation, a text:id attribute is not necessary because there are no start and end elements to match." p142 I could not find a full explantation of the 'text:id' tag but it seems to be used in various contexts. It is used in tracking changed texts, notes, footnotes and bookmarks. regards David --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
