First I would like to express my gratitude to CPHennessy for putting in such
an effort under difficult circumstance, not helped much by my documentation.
On Sunday 26 March 2006 2:33 am, CPHennessy wrote:
> > In the new approach, those five citations each point to the same --
> > single -- metadata record, which is moved out of the content file into
> > its own dedicated file.
>
> Ah, now this was not clear to me. But the example docs you gave me did
> not do this. I presume that this was to make life a bit easier for me. It
> has but it left a gap in my understanding which you have now partially
> filled.
>
>
I had tried explain the proposed document structure in
http://bibliographic.openoffice.org/enhanced-save-package-description.html
and
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Bibliographic_Document_XML_Format
which are linked from the Developer's wiki page
(
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Bibliographic_Project's_Developer_Page
).
These two pages, which I now see, the poor reader would have had to examine
both carefully and some-how integrate in order to get the full picture, try
to show how the current bibliographic and the proposed writer document
structure which is stored in the content.xml file. It also tries to show one
of the major changes which is is to move the reference details out of
content.xml to a new document in the save package, which I have called
biblio-data.xml. A suggested format for that file is shown on the
'enhanced-save-package-description.html' wiki page.
I hope this and the changes I will make to the wiki pages today will make it
much clearer.
regards
David
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
