On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 04:53:22PM +1100, David Wilson wrote:
> On Friday 31 March 2006 9:41 am, Matt Price wrote:
> 
> > I'm just thinking that if we (I know the first person is a bit iffy
> > here, as I'm hardly active) can start parcelling the project up a bit
> > better, we might find that there are a fair number of bits that non-C
> > programmers can work on.
> I am open to suggestions on how to do this. I have had list of tasks up on 
> the 
> web site for some years - with not many takers. But we also need to develop 
> and document the tasks much better than we have so that people can assess 
> what they would be getting themselves into. 
> 
> CPH is doing some good work documenting the biblio coding.

I think now that someone (CPH!) is actually starting to work on
reconding the writer bits, it becomes apparent, at least to me, how
much other stuff still needs to be done and I think if (as you
suggest) the tasks arebetter defined and documented the chances of
getting folks to slice off bits & takethem on, are higher.

gotta run.
matt


> 
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

--------------------------
 .''`.       Matt Price 
: :'  :      Debian User
`. `'`       & hemi-geek
  `-     
-------------------------- 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to