On Apr 5, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Matt Price wrote:
should it be a little more extensive here? so for instnace: I am
extremely disorganized, and in the absence of a satisfactory
bibliogrpahic solution have dealt with various bibs in the last few
years. On one paper I use one bib, for another project I may have a
wholly different one. So shouldthe uri be:
person:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:SOME_HASH_HERE:smith99
I'm not really sure exactly what it should be, but yeah, it'd take some
thought.
I should also add that using uris for association is likely what will
be the outcome of the metadata work at the ODF TC. It provides a
standard and general mechanism to link content and metadata.
How's that?
do you guys have some docs on this emerging standard?
It's not emerging; it's already widely used:
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Identifier>
See how examples like RDF and XLink use uris for linking. One example
of the former relevant to this discussion:
<http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2004/06/02/dijalog.html>
Bruce
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
