I think it eventually boils down to who will be maintaining the component. As Jay said - there's maintainer for the component and if it will continue like this we might have no choice but delete it: I think right now it blocks the release.
Cos On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 02:29PM, Ed - 0x1b wrote: > some links to some of Mahout's replacements - not all Apache projects. > > https://gigaom.com/2014/03/27/apache-mahout-hadoops-original-machine-learning-project-is-moving-on-from-mapreduce/ > http://0xdata.com/ > https://spark.apache.org/mllib/ > https://databricks.com/blog/2014/06/30/sparkling-water-h20-spark.html > https://github.com/apache/mahout/tree/master/h2o > > and > > https://gigaom.com/2014/02/28/cloudera-is-rebuilding-machine-learning-for-hadoop-with-oryx/ > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks man! I've heard that there's a new project that picks up where Mahout > > left of wrt Hadoop2.x support. But might be I am just delusional from > > hunger...? > > > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 02:32PM, jay vyas wrote: > >> i sent a email to mahout-dev... maybe someone will ping back :) > >> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Jay Vyas <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> Iirc we don't have any maintainers for it. > >> Is anyone interested in maintaining it? > >> > On Mar 6, 2015, at 2:23 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > Does anyone know what's the story with Mahout? Has it been fixed to > >> be > >> working > >> > with Hadoop2 or shall we remove it from the BOM? > >> > > >> > Cos > >> > > >> >> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 06:56PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >> >> Guys, > >> >> > >> >> It'd be great if we can have the next release ready by ApacheCon in > >> April. > >> >> Think about all the PR and publicity we can get without any effort > >> on > >> our own. > >> >> And perhaps from the tactical standpoint we shall call this release > >> 1.0? > >> >> > >> >> I believe the only major hurdle between us and the release is CI. > >> Roman, I > >> >> understand you're busy elsewhere, but could you please let us know > >> what else > >> >> needs to be done before we can start doing the regular builds and > >> how > >> the > >> >> community can help. That's the highest priority, IMO. > >> >> > >> >> There a couple of the tickets left unfixed/unassigned on > >> BIGTOP-1480, > >> and if > >> >> they aren't resolved on time we can move them farther. There's > >> lesser > >> than a > >> >> half-dozen blockers and none of them look too big, honestly. And we > >> have a > >> >> whole lot of active committers and contributors to wrap-up the > >> release in a > >> >> couple of weeks. > >> >> > >> >> Do we want to try upgrade to HBase 1.x for this release or it might > >> be too big > >> >> of a distortion? Andrew, what do you think and do you have cycles > >> to > >> do that? > >> >> > >> >> What else we need to get done for this release? Suggestions? > >> >> > >> >> Is there anyone who wants to step up as the RM this time around? RM > >> doesn't > >> >> mean that you have to do all the job, but rather be an efficient > >> with > >> a stick ;) > >> >> > >> >> Thoughts? > >> >>A Cos > >> > >> -- > >> jay vyas
