So, anyone is interested to maintain Mahout and a thing of similar nature? Cos
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 02:13AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > I think it eventually boils down to who will be maintaining the component. > > As Jay said - there's maintainer for the component and if it will continue > like this we might have no choice but delete it: I think right now it blocks > the release. > > Cos > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 02:29PM, Ed - 0x1b wrote: > > some links to some of Mahout's replacements - not all Apache projects. > > > > https://gigaom.com/2014/03/27/apache-mahout-hadoops-original-machine-learning-project-is-moving-on-from-mapreduce/ > > http://0xdata.com/ > > https://spark.apache.org/mllib/ > > https://databricks.com/blog/2014/06/30/sparkling-water-h20-spark.html > > https://github.com/apache/mahout/tree/master/h2o > > > > and > > > > https://gigaom.com/2014/02/28/cloudera-is-rebuilding-machine-learning-for-hadoop-with-oryx/ > > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks man! I've heard that there's a new project that picks up where > > > Mahout > > > left of wrt Hadoop2.x support. But might be I am just delusional from > > > hunger...? > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 02:32PM, jay vyas wrote: > > >> i sent a email to mahout-dev... maybe someone will ping back :) > > >> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Jay Vyas <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> Iirc we don't have any maintainers for it. > > >> Is anyone interested in maintaining it? > > >> > On Mar 6, 2015, at 2:23 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > Does anyone know what's the story with Mahout? Has it been fixed > > >> to be > > >> working > > >> > with Hadoop2 or shall we remove it from the BOM? > > >> > > > >> > Cos > > >> > > > >> >> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 06:56PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > >> >> Guys, > > >> >> > > >> >> It'd be great if we can have the next release ready by ApacheCon > > >> in > > >> April. > > >> >> Think about all the PR and publicity we can get without any > > >> effort on > > >> our own. > > >> >> And perhaps from the tactical standpoint we shall call this > > >> release > > >> 1.0? > > >> >> > > >> >> I believe the only major hurdle between us and the release is CI. > > >> Roman, I > > >> >> understand you're busy elsewhere, but could you please let us > > >> know > > >> what else > > >> >> needs to be done before we can start doing the regular builds > > >> and how > > >> the > > >> >> community can help. That's the highest priority, IMO. > > >> >> > > >> >> There a couple of the tickets left unfixed/unassigned on > > >> BIGTOP-1480, > > >> and if > > >> >> they aren't resolved on time we can move them farther. There's > > >> lesser > > >> than a > > >> >> half-dozen blockers and none of them look too big, honestly. And > > >> we > > >> have a > > >> >> whole lot of active committers and contributors to wrap-up the > > >> release in a > > >> >> couple of weeks. > > >> >> > > >> >> Do we want to try upgrade to HBase 1.x for this release or it > > >> might > > >> be too big > > >> >> of a distortion? Andrew, what do you think and do you have > > >> cycles to > > >> do that? > > >> >> > > >> >> What else we need to get done for this release? Suggestions? > > >> >> > > >> >> Is there anyone who wants to step up as the RM this time around? > > >> RM > > >> doesn't > > >> >> mean that you have to do all the job, but rather be an efficient > > >> with > > >> a stick ;) > > >> >> > > >> >> Thoughts? > > >> >>A Cos > > >> > > >> -- > > >> jay vyas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
