But the last time, back in 0.8, we found that runtime is pretty broken. So, is
there any real reason to keep on pushing an incompatible piece of software?

Cos

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:42AM, jay vyas wrote:
>    At this point we can just keep packaging as is, but if bugs crop up, drop
>    it unless we can get help
>    On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]>
>    wrote:
> 
>      Should read
> 
>      So, anyone is interested to maintain Mahout OR a thing of similar
>      nature?
> 
>      Sorry
>      On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 08:45PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>      > So, anyone is interested to maintain Mahout and a thing of similar
>      nature?
> 
>      >
>      > Cos
>      >
>      > On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 02:13AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>      > > I think it eventually boils down to who will be maintaining the
>      component.
>      > >
>      > > As Jay said - there's maintainer for the component and if it will
>      continue
>      > > like this we might have no choice but delete it: I think right now
>      it blocks
>      > > the release.
>      > >
>      > > Cos
>      > >
>      > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 02:29PM, Ed - 0x1b wrote:
>      > > > some links to some of Mahout's replacements - not all Apache
>      projects.
>      > > >
>      > > >
>      
> https://gigaom.com/2014/03/27/apache-mahout-hadoops-original-machine-learning-project-is-moving-on-from-mapreduce/
>      > > > http://0xdata.com/
>      > > > https://spark.apache.org/mllib/
>      > > >
>      https://databricks.com/blog/2014/06/30/sparkling-water-h20-spark.html
>      > > > https://github.com/apache/mahout/tree/master/h2o
>      > > >
>      > > > and
>      > > >
>      > > >
>      
> https://gigaom.com/2014/02/28/cloudera-is-rebuilding-machine-learning-for-hadoop-with-oryx/
>      > > >
>      > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Konstantin Boudnik
>      <[email protected]> wrote:
>      > > > > Thanks man! I've heard that there's a new project that picks up
>      where Mahout
>      > > > > left of wrt Hadoop2.x support. But might be I am just delusional
>      from
>      > > > > hunger...?
>      > > > >
>      > > > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 02:32PM, jay vyas wrote:
>      > > > >>A  A  i sent a email to mahout-dev... maybe someone will ping
>      back :)
>      > > > >>A  A  On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Jay Vyas
>      <[email protected]>
>      > > > >>A  A  wrote:
>      > > > >>
>      > > > >>A  A  A  Iirc we don't have any maintainers for it.
>      > > > >>A  A  A  Is anyone interested in maintaining it?
>      > > > >>A  A  A  > On Mar 6, 2015, at 2:23 PM, Konstantin Boudnik
>      <[email protected]> wrote:
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >
>      > > > >>A  A  A  > Does anyone know what's the story with Mahout? Has it
>      been fixed to be
>      > > > >>A  A  A  working
>      > > > >>A  A  A  > with Hadoop2 or shall we remove it from the BOM?
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >
>      > > > >>A  A  A  > Cos
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 06:56PM, Konstantin Boudnik
>      wrote:
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >> Guys,
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >>
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >> It'd be great if we can have the next release ready
>      by ApacheCon in
>      > > > >>A  A  A  April.
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >> Think about all the PR and publicity we can get
>      without any effort on
>      > > > >>A  A  A  our own.
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >> And perhaps from the tactical standpoint we shall
>      call this release
>      > > > >>A  A  A  1.0?
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >>
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >> I believe the only major hurdle between us and the
>      release is CI.
>      > > > >>A  A  A  Roman, I
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >> understand you're busy elsewhere, but could you
>      please let us know
>      > > > >>A  A  A  what else
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >> needs to be done before we can start doing the
>      regular builds and how
>      > > > >>A  A  A  the
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >> community can help. That's the highest priority,
>      IMO.
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >>
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >> There a couple of the tickets left
>      unfixed/unassigned on BIGTOP-1480,
>      > > > >>A  A  A  and if
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >> they aren't resolved on time we can move them
>      farther. There's lesser
>      > > > >>A  A  A  than a
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >> half-dozen blockers and none of them look too big,
>      honestly. And we
>      > > > >>A  A  A  have a
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >> whole lot of active committers and contributors to
>      wrap-up the
>      > > > >>A  A  A  release in a
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >> couple of weeks.
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >>
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >> Do we want to try upgrade to HBase 1.x for this
>      release or it might
>      > > > >>A  A  A  be too big
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >> of a distortion? Andrew, what do you think and do
>      you have cycles to
>      > > > >>A  A  A  do that?
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >>
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >> What else we need to get done for this release?
>      Suggestions?
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >>
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >> Is there anyone who wants to step up as the RM this
>      time around? RM
>      > > > >>A  A  A  doesn't
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >> mean that you have to do all the job, but rather be
>      an efficient with
>      > > > >>A  A  A  a stick ;)
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >>
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >> Thoughts?
>      > > > >>A  A  A  >>AA  Cos
>      > > > >>
>      > > > >>A  A  --
>      > > > >>A  A  jay vyas
> 
>    --
>    jay vyas

Reply via email to