I believe it's for project name. isn't it.?
On 06/07/22, 7:27 AM, "Masatake Iwasaki" <[email protected]> wrote: > But As we are not releasing as enterprise should be fine I think. IMO, We need to create folders and refer stacknames so ambari-select,bigtop-select wn't looks good. Not fine. We have a trademark policy. https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Ffoundation%2Fmarks%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cbbattula%40visa.com%7Cb64a88fb78394de8aaf508da5ef2db2f%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637926694401723403%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=d%2FFv5RAGFpP%2BP15jme5yHf5Bj2B47qHxbo8CVwwFXNo%3D&reserved=0 On 2022/07/06 10:37, Battula, Brahma Reddy wrote: >> Should we avoid unrecognized brand which may be trademark of someone? >> ambari-select or bigtop-select should be enough. > > Not sure, where to confirm whether there is already trademark. When I googled found so many. > But As we are not releasing as enterprise should be fine I think. IMO, We need to create folders and refer stacknames so ambari-select,bigtop-select wn't looks good. > May be you can refer the initial proposal [2] where I mentioned some more names. (BDS-BigDataStack,OSS-OpenSourceSelect..) > > Finally thanks a bunch for long healthy discussions on this. Mostly we all same page now. > > 1. https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dbdp%26safe%3Dactive%26sxsrf%3DALiCzsaQDcQS0gb8KbAMfjadXuG-jomxRQ%253A1657070844287%26ei%3D_OTEYsuWEYrD4-EPp4uKqAE%26ved%3D0ahUKEwjLhKr4jeP4AhWK4TgGHaeFAhUQ4dUDCA4%26uact%3D5%26oq%3Dbdp%26gs_lcp%3DCgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyBAgjECcyBAgjECcyCggAELEDEIMBEEMyCwgAEIAEELEDEIMBMgsIABCABBCxAxCDATIRCC4QgAQQsQMQgwEQxwEQ0QMyBQgAEIAEMgUIABCABDIFCAAQgAQyBQgAEIAEOgcIABBHELADOgYIABAeEBY6CggAEB4QDxAWEAo6CggAEIAEEIcCEBQ6CwguEIAEEMcBEK8BOgcIABCABBAKOhYILhCABBCHAhCxAxCDARDHARDRAxAUSgQIQRgASgQIRhgAUKsHWNgRYLoWaAFwAXgAgAGoAYgBtAeSAQMwLjiYAQCgAQHIAQjAAQE%26sclient%3Dgws-wiz&data=05%7C01%7Cbbattula%40visa.com%7Cb64a88fb78394de8aaf508da5ef2db2f%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637926694401723403%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=bmAvP%2BO3vXS4Ro4f%2BBLh9Z8w56kPcBIFaULHFQ0zCgM%3D&reserved=0 > > 2. https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2Fm77lhzo0njr2dhoock5twtm0c19j2py8&data=05%7C01%7Cbbattula%40visa.com%7Cb64a88fb78394de8aaf508da5ef2db2f%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637926694401723403%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=VhxZFBE0kjTNGqO18iXr2ITBsH8RRKxlyXGZuqJN9xA%3D&reserved=0 > > > On 06/07/22, 4:01 AM, "Masatake Iwasaki" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > We have still not officially finalized the new replacement name for > > hdp-select, it would likely be bdp-select (bdp: BigData Platform). However, > > the purpose of bdp-select and conf-select remains the same. > > Should we avoid unrecognized brand which may be trademark of someone? > ambari-select or bigtop-select should be enough. > > On 2022/06/29 13:52, Viraj Jasani wrote: > > Hi Ambari/Bigtop dev, > > > > As per the new roadmap of Apache Ambari, we would like to propose moving > > certain scripts (previously known as hdp-select and conf-select) to Bigtop > > so that their rpm installation could be managed independently. > > These scripts are a basic necessity in the Ambari framework for the > > installation of various Bigdata packages. The only major changes they would > > receive is when we onboard new services and components to Ambari, else they > > usually do not receive updates. In the past, we used to get hdp-select rpm > > downloaded and installed from HDP repositories. > > > > We have still not officially finalized the new replacement name for > > hdp-select, it would likely be bdp-select (bdp: BigData Platform). However, > > the purpose of bdp-select and conf-select remains the same. > > >
