Thank you for your explanation, Brahma.
CRH (abbreviation of "CHINA REDOOP HYPERLOOP" [1]) is supposed to be a
trademark of Redoop, so they can name the script crh-select without
problem.
But regarding BDP for example, I can easily find products that have
the same name [2][3][4] as you already mentioned, so I'd like to
recommend bigtop-select for avoiding unnecessary trouble.
Or, a single and more general word just like conf-select may be less
troublesome than bdp. How about "stack-select", for example?

[1]: https://docs.redoop.com/
[2]: https://datumstudio.jp/en/bigdataplatform/
[3]: 
https://help.talend.com/r/en-US/8.0/studio-getting-started-guide-big-data-platform/introduction
[4]: https://www.harmony-alliance.eu/bigdata-platform/big-data-platform

Kengo Seki <[email protected]>

On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 2:51 AM Battula, Brahma Reddy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>     >Do you mean that you're going to name the module (same as "component"
>     >in the Bigtop terminology, I think) bigtop-distro-select,
>     >and still the script in question bdp-select? If so, is there any
>     >reason that the script must be that name?
>     >(No offence, I just want to understand your thoughts and its
>     >background, and avoid the conflict or user's confusion with existing
>     >trademarks or products)
>
> Thanks @Kengo Seki for consolidating all the concerns. Name should represent 
> the stack which includes all the components hence planning to have like 
> bdp,bds...and this only one file like below[1]  which has done redoop.
>
>
> https://github.com/redoop/bigtop/tree/e5f9fe81773180159d291f18ec366ac8bfa4d6d2/bigtop-packages/src/common/ambari-mpacks/selector
>
>
> On 07/07/22, 6:07 AM, "Kengo Seki" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>     The following concern Masatake mentioned before is an important point,
>     so I talked to Brahma for clarifying his intention on the ASF Slack
>     yesterday.
>
>     > Multiple versions of the same package (deb/rpm) can not be installed at 
> the same time.
>     > IIRC, HDP uses convention in which the product version is part of 
> package name
>     > for addressing this.
>
>     > I don't like to bring the awkward package name convention to Bigtop
>     > at least by default.
>
>     He's planning to adopt the same mitigation as HDP for now, but he
>     doesn't intend to change the default package naming convention of
>     Bigtop,
>     but just add a new functionality to include an extra part into the
>     package name for avoiding conflict, which is disabled by default.
>
>     And Brahma, let me confirm about the following reply:
>
>     > Sure, we can have module name like bigtop-distro-select.
>
>     Do you mean that you're going to name the module (same as "component"
>     in the Bigtop terminology, I think) bigtop-distro-select,
>     and still the script in question bdp-select? If so, is there any
>     reason that the script must be that name?
>     (No offence, I just want to understand your thoughts and its
>     background, and avoid the conflict or user's confusion with existing
>     trademarks or products)
>
>     Kengo Seki <[email protected]>
>
>     On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 2:08 AM Battula, Brahma Reddy
>     <[email protected]> wrote:
>     >
>     > >   The name of stack based no Bigtop should be Bigtop.
>     >   >   If you can not accept the name like bigtop-*, the work should 
> done outside of Bigtop.
>     >   >  I will cast -1 if someone submit a patch to add a module with the 
> name spoiling branding.
>     >
>     > Sure, we can have module name like  bigtop-distro-select.
>     > Initially we'll do this separate branch.
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > On 06/07/22, 8:55 AM, "Masatake Iwasaki" <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>     >
>     >     > I believe it's for project name. isn't it.?
>     >
>     >     projects and products.
>     >
>     >     > IMO, We need to create folders and refer stacknames so 
> ambari-select,bigtop-select wn't looks good.
>     >
>     >     The name of stack based no Bigtop should be Bigtop.
>     >     If you can not accept the name like bigtop-*, the work should done 
> outside of Bigtop.
>     >     I will cast -1 if someone submit a patch to add a module with the 
> name spoiling branding.
>     >
>     >
>     >     On 2022/07/06 11:44, Battula, Brahma Reddy wrote:
>     >     >
>     >     > I believe it's for project name. isn't it.?
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     > On 06/07/22, 7:27 AM, "Masatake Iwasaki" 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>     >     >
>     >     >      > But As we are not releasing as enterprise should be fine I 
> think. IMO, We need to create folders and refer stacknames so 
> ambari-select,bigtop-select wn't looks good.
>     >     >
>     >     >      Not fine.
>     >     >      We have a trademark policy.
>     >     >      
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.apache.org%2Ffoundation%2Fmarks%2F&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbbattula%40visa.com%7C2cf3b754b1274bf79c1a08da5fb0edaf%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637927510750937928%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=uLAUZWy9EpJRNUYeuhSL951CbEdtLYFxrOFK%2BWW5Elg%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >     >
>     >     >      On 2022/07/06 10:37, Battula, Brahma Reddy wrote:
>     >     >      >> Should we avoid unrecognized brand which may be trademark 
> of someone?
>     >     >      >> ambari-select or bigtop-select should be enough.
>     >     >      >
>     >     >      > Not sure, where to confirm whether there is already 
> trademark. When I googled found so many.
>     >     >      > But As we are not releasing as enterprise should be fine I 
> think. IMO, We need to create folders and refer stacknames so 
> ambari-select,bigtop-select wn't looks good.
>     >     >      > May be you can refer the initial proposal [2] where I 
> mentioned some more names. (BDS-BigDataStack,OSS-OpenSourceSelect..)
>     >     >      >
>     >     >      > Finally thanks a bunch for long healthy discussions on 
> this. Mostly we all same page now.
>     >     >      >
>     >     >      > 1. 
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dbdp%26safe%3Dactive%26sxsrf%3DALiCzsaQDcQS0gb8KbAMfjadXuG-jomxRQ%253A1657070844287%26ei%3D_OTEYsuWEYrD4-EPp4uKqAE%26ved%3D0ahUKEwjLhKr4jeP4AhWK4TgGHaeFAhUQ4dUDCA4%26uact%3D5%26oq%3Dbdp%26gs_lcp%3DCgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyBAgjECcyBAgjECcyCggAELEDEIMBEEMyCwgAEIAEELEDEIMBMgsIABCABBCxAxCDATIRCC4QgAQQsQMQgwEQxwEQ0QMyBQgAEIAEMgUIABCABDIFCAAQgAQyBQgAEIAEOgcIABBHELADOgYIABAeEBY6CggAEB4QDxAWEAo6CggAEIAEEIcCEBQ6CwguEIAEEMcBEK8BOgcIABCABBAKOhYILhCABBCHAhCxAxCDARDHARDRAxAUSgQIQRgASgQIRhgAUKsHWNgRYLoWaAFwAXgAgAGoAYgBtAeSAQMwLjiYAQCgAQHIAQjAAQE%26sclient%3Dgws-wiz&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbbattula%40visa.com%7C2cf3b754b1274bf79c1a08da5fb0edaf%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637927510750937928%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=8NSFFz1Ko1oZFar%2Bz0%2FML9LgJHUNf0bLw7VVbtGP1ck%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >     >      >
>     >     >      > 2. 
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.apache.org%2Fthread%2Fm77lhzo0njr2dhoock5twtm0c19j2py8&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbbattula%40visa.com%7C2cf3b754b1274bf79c1a08da5fb0edaf%7C38305e12e15d4ee888b9c4db1c477d76%7C0%7C0%7C637927510750937928%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=I%2BbQoYUU5upYS1VQT1rux5ZZhh%2Fx1yeyD%2BnLW8HJwkw%3D&amp;reserved=0
>     >     >      >
>     >     >      >
>     >     >      > On 06/07/22, 4:01 AM, "Masatake Iwasaki" 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>     >     >      >
>     >     >      >      > We have still not officially finalized the new 
> replacement name for
>     >     >      >      > hdp-select, it would likely be bdp-select (bdp: 
> BigData Platform). However,
>     >     >      >      > the purpose of bdp-select and conf-select remains 
> the same.
>     >     >      >
>     >     >      >      Should we avoid unrecognized brand which may be 
> trademark of someone?
>     >     >      >      ambari-select or bigtop-select should be enough.
>     >     >      >
>     >     >      >      On 2022/06/29 13:52, Viraj Jasani wrote:
>     >     >      >      > Hi Ambari/Bigtop dev,
>     >     >      >      >
>     >     >      >      > As per the new roadmap of Apache Ambari, we would 
> like to propose moving
>     >     >      >      > certain scripts (previously known as hdp-select and 
> conf-select) to Bigtop
>     >     >      >      > so that their rpm installation could be managed 
> independently.
>     >     >      >      > These scripts are a basic necessity in the Ambari 
> framework for the
>     >     >      >      > installation of various Bigdata packages. The only 
> major changes they would
>     >     >      >      > receive is when we onboard new services and 
> components to Ambari, else they
>     >     >      >      > usually do not receive updates. In the past, we 
> used to get hdp-select rpm
>     >     >      >      > downloaded and installed from HDP repositories.
>     >     >      >      >
>     >     >      >      > We have still not officially finalized the new 
> replacement name for
>     >     >      >      > hdp-select, it would likely be bdp-select (bdp: 
> BigData Platform). However,
>     >     >      >      > the purpose of bdp-select and conf-select remains 
> the same.
>     >     >      >      >
>     >     >      >
>     >     >
>     >
>     >
>     > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>     > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>     >
>
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>     For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to