Re: [bizdev] quality of http://bizdev.openoffice.org/consultants.html

[Louis Suarez-Potts]

Hi
On 2006-11-16, at 07:30 , Kaj Kandler wrote:

Hi Louis,
sorry I'm relatively new here. I really didn't want to re-discuss the
issues that have already been decided.

You are very gracious :-) Sorry if I sounded a little exasperated.

Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:

I had not really intended in embarking on this discussion at this
point, but why not? For starters, see my presentation at OOoCon:

Agreed, I'd rather go to work as well to fix the current page first and then see where we go from there. Do you see any sense in that? Or do you

feel this is a waste of time and effort?

No, not at all. The changeover to a for-fee wiki (or equiv or not) idea won't happen overnight. It will affect a lot of people--like those on the list, to begin with--who must be contacted.

It looks like there are three resources available Liana, Peter and

a bit) could share with us the criteria he used.

myself. That should make a difference, if we can formulate a policy (for the list as is) and if we can get the permission to do so. I personally would be fine if Adam (the current maintainer, who I hope would stay on

That would be great, and let's work on that, then.

My priority is getting the service for OOo users and OOo consultants
back online.

Quite.

Kind regards,
Kaj

Thanks
louis

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature