Hello, I think that we should not be afraid of corporations paying more and leaving the OOo contributors aside. We're not that many to be in this case, Laurent, at least I don't see more than twenty small companies (aside Sun, Novell and Red Hat) being regular or important contributors to OOo. And I think Louis and Erwin and we know most of them already so they should also have a proeminent visibility.
But once again Laurent: OOo needs money wether you want it or not.... Best, Charles. Laurent Godard a écrit : > Hi > >> Also there (for extensions), it could be usefull to allow a large >> group of >> non-paying extension projects and also open up to sponsors if they want >> to pay to get a more prominent position on the web site. >> > > This is very dangerous imho > OOo Extensions has to support and avertize high quality stuff, not being > dependant of any 'pressure' > > OOo Extensions have to be designed with 'sources' (repositories ar linux > distibutions by example) > - OOo (by default) > - OOo-earning-Money > - Company 1 (added by user) > - Company 2 (added by user) > > may be a post-metadata on extensions telling "money given > back" and then be listed in an other category (or with a special icon) > > This is rough idea that can be technically discussed on [EMAIL PROTECTED] > list > > Laurent > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
