On 09.05.2013 09:05, Olemis Lang wrote: > On 5/8/13, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 08.05.2013 06:49, Olemis Lang wrote: >>> On 5/7/13, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote: > [...] >>>> How long do you propose to publish release candidates that are not >>>> actually release candidates because we know functional changes are still >>>> on the drawing board? >>>> >>> What are the functional changes ? BH relations ? If so , the way I see >>> it using all plugins except that one will result in a working system . >> But so will using plain vanilla Trac. What's your point? >> > Briefly , my point is > > 1. BH relations off is not a problem > (as opposite to e.g. BH dashboard off , > which is a huge problem ...)
Ticket relations are one of the things we've (implicitly) included what we arbitrarily call the 1.0 feature set. I see no good reason to drop them from that set for the sake of calling something 1.0 a few weeks earlier than otherwise. That's one of the points I'm trying to get across. The other is exactly what Joe said: a 1.0 release is a signal. Let's make sure it's a positive one. There are, in my opinion, tons of little details that can still do with polishing. There's no rush. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
