Regarding the 0.6 release: I've not seen any specific objections in this thread to that being released - other than relations being "about two weeks away". That as about two weeks ago. It appears to be in a stable state judging by our latest nightly build[1].
Our last release has now been over a month ago (a bug fix), while out last 0.x release was packaged up over two months ago. Any improvements that have gone into trunk since are not available to those downloading Bloodhound every day[2]. I believe we should package up a release in the next few days, then move on to working towards 0.7. Are there any volunteers for release manager? Cheers, Joe [1] https://bh-demo1.apache.org/products/%40/ticket/156 [2] http://goo.gl/#analytics/goo.gl/D4hf5/month On 9 May 2013 09:25, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote: > On 09.05.2013 09:05, Olemis Lang wrote: > > On 5/8/13, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 08.05.2013 06:49, Olemis Lang wrote: > >>> On 5/7/13, Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote: > > [...] > >>>> How long do you propose to publish release candidates that are not > >>>> actually release candidates because we know functional changes are > still > >>>> on the drawing board? > >>>> > >>> What are the functional changes ? BH relations ? If so , the way I see > >>> it using all plugins except that one will result in a working system . > >> But so will using plain vanilla Trac. What's your point? > >> > > Briefly , my point is > > > > 1. BH relations off is not a problem > > (as opposite to e.g. BH dashboard off , > > which is a huge problem ...) > > Ticket relations are one of the things we've (implicitly) included what > we arbitrarily call the 1.0 feature set. I see no good reason to drop > them from that set for the sake of calling something 1.0 a few weeks > earlier than otherwise. That's one of the points I'm trying to get across. > > The other is exactly what Joe said: a 1.0 release is a signal. Let's > make sure it's a positive one. There are, in my opinion, tons of little > details that can still do with polishing. There's no rush. > > -- Brane > > -- > Branko Čibej > Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com > > -- Joe Dreimann | *User Experience Designer* | WANdisco<http://www.wandisco.com/> @jdreimann <https://twitter.com/jdreimann> * * *Join one of our free daily demo sessions on* *Scaling Subversion for the Enterprise <http://www.wandisco.com/training/webinars>* THIS MESSAGE AND ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE CONFIDENTIAL, PROPRIETARY, AND MAY BE PRIVILEGED. If this message was misdirected, WANdisco, Inc. and its subsidiaries, ("WANdisco") does not waive any confidentiality or privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and destroy the message without disclosing its contents to anyone. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. The views and opinions expressed in this e-mail message are the author's own and may not reflect the views and opinions of WANdisco, unless the author is authorized by WANdisco to express such views or opinions on its behalf. All email sent to or from this address is subject to electronic storage and review by WANdisco. Although WANdisco operates anti-virus programs, it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever caused by viruses being passed.
