On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Olemis Lang <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 7/17/13, Matevž Bradač <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 17. Jul, 2013, at 22:37, Alexander Heusingfeld wrote: > > > >> +1 backward compatible bugfix releases should always have a minor > version > >> number > > > > +1, I'm also in favour of 0.6.1. > > > > JFTR , the Bloodhound project does not adopt the semantic versioning > [1]_ [2]_ . It should be ok to proceed with any of 0.6.1 or 0.7.0 , > even if 0.6.1 seems to be a logical choice (that I prefer) . > > .. [1] http://semver.org > > .. [2] http://markmail.org/message/pfjqchk47samthg5 > +1 Release a new bug fix release in the next few days. Thank you for starting this thread and giving the issue visibility. I've merged the two changesets associated with #592 into the 0.6 branch so that we can do some testing. I plan to do testing tomorrow. Please report back if you've tested the changes for a particular configuration and can confirm the issue is fixed on the 0.6 branch.
