On 7/18/13, Ryan Ollos <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Olemis Lang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 7/17/13, Matevž Bradač <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 17. Jul, 2013, at 22:37, Alexander Heusingfeld wrote:
>> >
>> >> +1 backward compatible bugfix releases should always have a minor
>> version
>> >> number
>> >
>> > +1, I'm also in favour of 0.6.1.
>> >
>>
>> JFTR , the Bloodhound project does not adopt the semantic versioning
>> [1]_ [2]_ . It should be ok to proceed with any of 0.6.1 or 0.7.0 ,
>> even if 0.6.1 seems to be a logical choice (that I prefer) .
>>
>> .. [1] http://semver.org
>>
>> .. [2] http://markmail.org/message/pfjqchk47samthg5
>>
>
> +1 Release a new bug fix release in the next few days.
>
> Thank you for starting this thread and giving the issue visibility.
>
> I've merged the two changesets associated with #592 into the 0.6 branch so
> that we can do some testing. I plan to do testing tomorrow. Please report
> back if you've tested the changes for a particular configuration and can
> confirm the issue is fixed on the 0.6 branch.
>
This is what I did after checking out 0.6 branch :
- Ran the unit test suite
* test report http://goo.gl/ZwCla
* ... only expected failures
- Applied patches for #387 and ran the functional test suite
* test report http://goo.gl/NI2Bf
* ... a few minor failures !
Moreover blood-hound.net is running the code in /trunk and :
- References to global: TracLinks are working as expected
* e.g. in http://dataviz.blood-hound.net/wiki/UserDoc/TracLinks
- URL generation for product: links is working fine too
* e.g. in http://dataviz.blood-hound.net/wiki/UserDoc
... and finally considering feedback received in #594 it seems that
SCRIPT_NAME issue will be gone after applying proposed patches (...
though I think I'll write a functional test case for that ... but that
may be scheduled as part of forthcoming milestones)
IOW we should be really close to move forward with the release since a
few minor failures are noticed beyond known pending failures / errors.
We only have a few minor regressions .
--
Regards,
Olemis.
