Sijie,
The problem seems to be that the public address (the one the hostname maps to)
and the virtual network are different. The tests that are failing seem to
expect that they are the same. Does it make sense?
-Flavio
On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 5:12 AM, Rakesh R <[email protected]> wrote:
Can we include BOOKKEEPER-834 fix also in 4.3.1, this is addressing one test
case failure.
-Rakesh
-----Original Message-----
From: Sijie Guo [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 18 March 2015 10:23
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: RC for 4.3.1?
I think RC0 is failed because of the failed tests. We need to address those
tests for producing the new RC.
- Sijie
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Flavio Junqueira <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Do we have a code freeze on branch 4.3 right now because of release 4.3.1?
> I'm actually not sure what's going on with the RC0 of 4.3.1.
>
> -Flavio
