I'm watching the discussion. Could you please tell me anything to be required/done from my side. Thanks!
Regards, Rakesh -----Original Message----- From: Sijie Guo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 20 March 2015 04:24 To: Flavio Junqueira Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: RC for 4.3.1? Yup. But it seems that your vm returns IP address as hostname. I guess that might be related your vm's DNS entry in cloud environment. On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not sure this is right. When I run locally, I get this in the logs > of CookieTest > > Host address: 127.0.0.1 > Host name: localhost > > while in the vm I get this: > > Host address: 10.0.0.4 > Host name: 10.0.0.4 > > "Host name" is what I get here in Bookie.java: > > if (conf.getUseHostNameAsBookieID()) { > hostAddress = inetAddr.getAddress().getCanonicalHostName(); > LOG.info("Host name: " + hostAddress); > } > > It shouldn't be returning the IP address, no? > > -Flavio > > On 19 Mar 2015, at 17:08, Sijie Guo <[email protected]> wrote: > > The hostname in that host will be resolved to be IP, which the IP and > hostname would be same. But the tests expect that the IP and hostname > are different. > > We should change the tool to allow passing in any bookie id, which > would make the tests more deterministic. > > - Sijie > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Flavio Junqueira < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Sijie, >> The problem seems to be that the public address (the one the hostname >> maps to) and the virtual network are different. The tests that are >> failing seem to expect that they are the same. Does it make sense? >> -Flavio >> >> >> On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 5:12 AM, Rakesh R >> <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> Can we include BOOKKEEPER-834 fix also in 4.3.1, this is addressing >> one test case failure. >> >> -Rakesh >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sijie Guo [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: 18 March 2015 10:23 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: RC for 4.3.1? >> >> I think RC0 is failed because of the failed tests. We need to address >> those tests for producing the new RC. >> >> - Sijie >> >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Flavio Junqueira < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Do we have a code freeze on branch 4.3 right now because of release >> 4.3.1? >> > I'm actually not sure what's going on with the RC0 of 4.3.1. >> > >> > -Flavio >> >> >> >> >> > > >
