Added a page about release schedule
http://bookkeeper.apache.org/community/releases/ and the timeline for 4.6.0.

- Sijie

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Il lun 14 ago 2017, 08:19 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Il sab 12 ago 2017, 04:35 Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I would like to have a a try on 4.6.0.
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > 4.5.0 is out. Although we haven't reached a conclusion whether we
> > want
> > > to
> > > > > adopt "Time Based Release Plan" yet, I would still like to start
> the
> > > > > discussion on the next releases.
> > > > >
> > > > > The next *feature* release will be 4.6.0 and we will probably have
> a
> > > bug
> > > > > fix 4.5.1 for branch 4.5. all the features will go to master and be
> > > > > included in 4.6.0; bug fixes will first go to master, if they
> impact
> > > > 4.5.0,
> > > > > those changes will be cherry-pick to branch-4.5 (on merging) and be
> > > > > included in 4.5.1.
> > > > >
> > > > > Besides that, there are a few things we need to discuss and plan
> > here:
> > > > >
> > > > > - what changes that we are planning to include in 4.6.0? If you
> > already
> > > > > have ideas, please bring them upfront. If you don't have anyone
> now,
> > > you
> > > > > can create issues later and mark them as `4.6.0`
> > > >
> > >
> > > I will create issues as soon as possible, but my (my company) areas of
> > > urgent work are:
> > > - java9 build, maybe non yes official support
> > >
> > > - relax durability, that is to not wait for synch on journal for some
> > > entries
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > [Jia] we have some changes that we'd like to get in. I will create
> > > issues
> > > > soon.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > - who will be the release managers to drive the next two releases?
> > one
> > > is
> > > > > for 4.6.0 feature release, the other one is 4.5.1 bug fix release.
> we
> > > > > should start a rotation between committers to drive the releases.
> Any
> > > > > volunteers for driving the releases?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Jia] I would like to have a try on 4.6.0.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I am available, for 4.6, 4.7 or even for 4.5.1
> > >
> >
> > Cool. Since Jia volunteers for release manager for 4.6, do you want to
> try
> > 4.5.1? we need to build a rotation of release managers.
> >
>
> Yes. Count on me.
>
> Enrico
>
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > - how long that we should target for 4.6.0 and 4.5.1? If we adopted
> > > `Time
> > > > > Based Release Plan`, we will be targeting at 4.6.0 release in
> > November.
> > > > For
> > > > > bug fix release, it can be a shorter one, around one month.
> > > >
> > >
> > > You think that we will need soon some horfix? 4.4 lasted one year and
> we
> > > did not need any 4.4.1. Maybe now 4.5 will be more adopted?
> > >
> >
> > Bugfix release is based on demand. If there is a requirement for 4.5.1,
> we
> > need to do it. If there is no changes need to be included for 4.5.1, we
> can
> > leave it open and close it eventually.
> >
> > - Sijie
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Enrico
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > [Jia] Sound good.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Thoughts, Volunteers?
> > > > >
> > > > > - Sijie
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > -- Enrico Olivelli
> > >
> >
> --
>
>
> -- Enrico Olivelli
>

Reply via email to