Added a page about release schedule http://bookkeeper.apache.org/community/releases/ and the timeline for 4.6.0.
- Sijie On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > Il lun 14 ago 2017, 08:19 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Il sab 12 ago 2017, 04:35 Jia Zhai <zhaiji...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to have a a try on 4.6.0. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > 4.5.0 is out. Although we haven't reached a conclusion whether we > > want > > > to > > > > > adopt "Time Based Release Plan" yet, I would still like to start > the > > > > > discussion on the next releases. > > > > > > > > > > The next *feature* release will be 4.6.0 and we will probably have > a > > > bug > > > > > fix 4.5.1 for branch 4.5. all the features will go to master and be > > > > > included in 4.6.0; bug fixes will first go to master, if they > impact > > > > 4.5.0, > > > > > those changes will be cherry-pick to branch-4.5 (on merging) and be > > > > > included in 4.5.1. > > > > > > > > > > Besides that, there are a few things we need to discuss and plan > > here: > > > > > > > > > > - what changes that we are planning to include in 4.6.0? If you > > already > > > > > have ideas, please bring them upfront. If you don't have anyone > now, > > > you > > > > > can create issues later and mark them as `4.6.0` > > > > > > > > > > I will create issues as soon as possible, but my (my company) areas of > > > urgent work are: > > > - java9 build, maybe non yes official support > > > > > > - relax durability, that is to not wait for synch on journal for some > > > entries > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Jia] we have some changes that we'd like to get in. I will create > > > issues > > > > soon. > > > > > > > > > > > > > - who will be the release managers to drive the next two releases? > > one > > > is > > > > > for 4.6.0 feature release, the other one is 4.5.1 bug fix release. > we > > > > > should start a rotation between committers to drive the releases. > Any > > > > > volunteers for driving the releases? > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Jia] I would like to have a try on 4.6.0. > > > > > > > > > > I am available, for 4.6, 4.7 or even for 4.5.1 > > > > > > > Cool. Since Jia volunteers for release manager for 4.6, do you want to > try > > 4.5.1? we need to build a rotation of release managers. > > > > Yes. Count on me. > > Enrico > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - how long that we should target for 4.6.0 and 4.5.1? If we adopted > > > `Time > > > > > Based Release Plan`, we will be targeting at 4.6.0 release in > > November. > > > > For > > > > > bug fix release, it can be a shorter one, around one month. > > > > > > > > > > You think that we will need soon some horfix? 4.4 lasted one year and > we > > > did not need any 4.4.1. Maybe now 4.5 will be more adopted? > > > > > > > Bugfix release is based on demand. If there is a requirement for 4.5.1, > we > > need to do it. If there is no changes need to be included for 4.5.1, we > can > > leave it open and close it eventually. > > > > - Sijie > > > > > > > > > > Enrico > > > > > > > > > > > > [Jia] Sound good. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts, Volunteers? > > > > > > > > > > - Sijie > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > -- Enrico Olivelli > > > > > > -- > > > -- Enrico Olivelli >