On Oct 25, 2017 12:53 AM, "Enrico Olivelli - Diennea" <
enrico.olive...@diennea.com> wrote:

Il giorno mar, 24/10/2017 alle 15.41 -0700, Sijie Guo ha scritto:

I filed an issue for the problem discussed here:
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/659


Sijie, Charan, thank you for catching this
IMHO we should take options 1 o 2 as Sijie proposed


I think we agreed on option 1.


Sijie,
Do you have an approximate idea about affected versions 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 ?


I think it impacts all those versions at sorted ledger storage, when
compaction happens to advance the checkpoint holder.

Sijie



Enrico




- Sijie

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Charan Reddy G <reddychara...@gmail.com<
mailto:reddychara...@gmail.com>>
wrote:



Sure Sijie and Ivan. It sounds appropriate.

Thanks,
Charan

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:00 AM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com<mailto:guo
si...@gmail.com>> wrote:



Yes, we should fix this ASAP.

Charan, what is your opinion on the fix?

- Sijie

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:12 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org<mailto:ivank
@apache.org>> wrote:





Use the approach that I used before (as in the old commits at twitter’s
branch). Ledger storage is responsible for instantiating the


checkpoints.
I would go with this approach. It was probably me that asked for the
changes in the other direction before, but I can't remember why I
asked for them, so the view held strongly then isn't held strongly
now.

It would be good to get this change in soon, so that when the yahoo
DbLedgerStorage goes in, we can verify that checkpointing works as
expected.

-Ivan










--

Enrico Olivelli Software Development Manager @Diennea Tel.: (+39) 0546
066100 - Int. 925 Viale G.Marconi 30/14 - 48018 Faenza (RA) MagNews -
E-mail Marketing Solutions http://www.magnews.it Diennea - Digital
Marketing Solutions http://www.diennea.com

________________________________

Iscriviti alla nostra newsletter per rimanere aggiornato su digital ed
email marketing! http://www.magnews.it/newsletter/

The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender
immediately and destroy this email. Any unauthorized, direct or indirect,
disclosure, copying, storage, distribution or other use is strictly
forbidden.

Reply via email to