Hi, JB & Kevin & Von,
Please take a look, 
Thanks

在 2019/9/25 下午12:28,“tan zhongyi”<zhongyi....@gmail.com> 写入:

    Hi, guys,
    
    
    
    Rc03 is ready for vote, here it is.
    
    
    
    I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of  apache 
brpc(incubating) 0.9.6-rc03.
    
    
    The source code can be found at:
    
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.6-rc03/apache-brpc-0.9.6.rc03-incubating-src.tar.gz
    
    
    The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.9.6-rc03, available 
here:
    https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/releases/tag/0.9.6-rc03
    
    
     The SHA-512 checksum is:
    
a09b1fb80baf041f7d9ac974b4591c1f97b8a4b35df99a421516ed72baa1bd66aed0ce56683b465ae3bdc7216dff404276d76f8e956119d0a1c1c73bed71002a
    
    which can be found via:
    
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.6-rc03/apache-brpc-0.9.6.rc03-incubating-src.tar.gz.sha512
    
    
    
    
    
    The signature can be found via:
    
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.6-rc03/apache-brpc-0.9.6.rc03-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
    
    
    
    KEYS file is available here:
    
    https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/KEYS
    
    
    
    
    
    [Release Note]
    
    
    
      *   Health (of a connection) can be checked at rpc-level
      *   Fix SSL-related compilation issues on Mac
      *   Support SSL-replacement lib MesaLink
      *   Support consistent hashing with ketama algo.
      *   bvar variables can be exported for prometheus services
      *   String[Multi]Splitter supports '\0' as separator
      *   Support for bilibili discovery service
      *   Improved CircuitBreaker
      *   grpc impl. supports timeout
    
    
    
    
    
    Please vote on releasing this package as:
    
    Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.6-rc03
    
    
    
    This vote will be open until “Mon Oct 30 2019 00:00:00 GMT+0800 (CST)" and
    
    passes if a majority of at least three +1 Apache brpc IPMC votes are
    
    cast.
    
    
    
    [ ] +1 Release this package
    
    [ ] 0  I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object
    
    [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
    
    
    Checklist for reference:
    [ ]Are release files in correct location?
    [ ]Do release files have the word incubating in their name?
    [ ] Are the digital signature and hashes correct?
    [ ] Does DISCLAIMER file exist?
    [ ]Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists?
    [ ] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct?
    [ ] Is the NOTICE year correct?
    [ ] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE or 
NOTICE?
    [ ] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE?
    Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so:
    [ ] Does the software have a compatible license?
    [ ] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE?
    [ ] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE?
    Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If so:
    [ ]Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this NOTICE file?
    [ ]Do all source files have ASF headers?
    [ ] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in version 
control?
    [ ] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release?
    [ ] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear?
    
    
    
    
    Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just committers, please
    
    feel free to try out the release candidate and provide your votes.
    
    Thanks
    
    

Reply via email to