zchuang185 commented on code in PR #3163:
URL: https://github.com/apache/brpc/pull/3163#discussion_r2575842068
##########
src/brpc/controller.cpp:
##########
@@ -1027,6 +1092,54 @@ void Controller::SubmitSpan() {
_span = NULL;
}
+void Controller::HandleIdleProgressiveReader(void* arg) {
+ if(arg == nullptr){
+ LOG(ERROR) << "Controller::HandleIdleProgressiveReader arg is null.";
+ return;
+ }
+ auto* cntl = static_cast<Controller*>(arg);
+ auto log_idle = FLAGS_log_idle_progressive_read_close;
+ int64_t progressive_read_timeout_us = cntl->_progressive_read_timeout_ms *
1000;
+ std::vector<SocketId> remove_socket_ids;
+ butil::AutoLock guard(cntl->_progressive_read_lock);
+ auto socketIds = cntl->_checking_progressive_read_fds;
+ for (auto socket_id : socketIds){
+ SocketUniquePtr s;
+ if (Socket::Address(socket_id, &s) == 0) {
+ int64_t pre_idle_duration_us = 0;
+ int64_t idle_duration_us = butil::cpuwide_time_us() -
s->last_active_time_us();
+ while (progressive_read_timeout_us > idle_duration_us &&
idle_duration_us > pre_idle_duration_us) {
+ auto sleep_ms = (progressive_read_timeout_us -
idle_duration_us) / 1000;
+ bthread_usleep(sleep_ms > 0 ? sleep_ms : 1);
Review Comment:
This loop mainly addresses the situation where idle_duration_us is smaller
than progressive_read_timeout_us. Generally, the difference between the two
values is very small, primarily because the handler where this loop resides is
triggered by a timer, and the trigger time is set by the parameter
progressive_read_timeout_us.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
