I had a look and I think the issue is related with this:
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg63326.html 
<https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg63326.html>

I think this should do the trick:
https://github.com/apache/commons-weaver/pull/1 
<https://github.com/apache/commons-weaver/pull/1>

Not sure if the report should be visible in the aggregator project. I think 
not. At least I was able to see the report in the processor project.

Hope it helps!

Cheers,
Roberto

> I'm still trying to find time to finish the 1.4 release of Commons Weaver.
> I thought it was ready, but since traffic on the Commons ML alerted me that
> I should double check that the japicmp report is actually running with the
> site goal. I might be able to take another look this Friday.
>
> Matt
>
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, 2:54 AM Thomas Andraschko <
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > 2018-08-22 9:52 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]>>:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau 
> > > <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>> |  Blog
> > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/ <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/>> | 
> > > Old Blog
> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>> | 
> > > Github <https://github.com/ <https://github.com/>
> > > rmannibucau> |
> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau 
> > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>> | Book
> > > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- 
> > > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java->
> > > ee-8-high-performance>
> > >
> > >
> > > Le mer. 22 août 2018 à 09:46, Mark Struberg <[email protected] 
> > > <mailto:[email protected]>
> >
> > a
> > > écrit :
> > >
> > > > hi folks!
> > > >
> > > > Do we want to go for a BVal-2.0.0 release?
> > > > Seems we pass the TCK, so we should really kick it off I'd say.
> > > >
> > > > Wdyt?
> > > >
> > > > LieGrue,
> > > > strub
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to