The Geronimo versions of the v1.x specs never had any Javadoc to speak of. This seems to be a problematic area anyway: how to document an API without infringing the copyright of the reference API.
Matt On Mon, Sep 10, 2018, 2:05 AM Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > wohuuu, trying to make up a bit time today or tomorrow to push the > geronimo-validation_2.0_spec release. > > If you want to add some JavaDocs before that then plz ping me and I wait a > bit. > Need to run the compat checks anyway before we can ship it. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 28.08.2018 um 15:57 schrieb Matt Benson <[email protected]>: > > > > Good catch, Mark! Thanks! > > > > Matt > > > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 6:53 AM Mark Struberg <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > >> We also need to release geronimo-validation-2.0. Will trigger this over > at > >> Geronimo. > >> > >> LieGrue, > >> strub > >> > >> > >>> Am 27.08.2018 um 20:32 schrieb Roberto Cortez > >> <[email protected]>: > >>> > >>> Great. Let me know if I can help. > >>> > >>>> On 27 Aug 2018, at 16:10, Matt Benson <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Sounds like the basic plan, yes. > >>>> > >>>> Matt > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 4:55 AM Roberto Cortez > >> <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Great! Thanks. > >>>>> So, do you think we can push for a Weaver release, so we can then > push > >> the > >>>>> BVal release? We are trying to push for a TomEE 8 release, so we need > >> both > >>>>> :) > >>>>> Cheers,Roberto > >>>>> On Friday, August 24, 2018, 10:20:17 PM GMT+1, Matt Benson < > >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, merged! > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018, 12:45 PM Roberto Cortez > >> <[email protected] > >>>>>> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I had a look and I think the issue is related with this: > >>>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg63326.html < > >>>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg63326.html> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I think this should do the trick: > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/commons-weaver/pull/1 < > >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/commons-weaver/pull/1> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Not sure if the report should be visible in the aggregator project. > I > >>>>>> think not. At least I was able to see the report in the processor > >>>>> project. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hope it helps! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>> Roberto > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'm still trying to find time to finish the 1.4 release of Commons > >>>>>> Weaver. > >>>>>>> I thought it was ready, but since traffic on the Commons ML alerted > >> me > >>>>>> that > >>>>>>> I should double check that the japicmp report is actually running > >> with > >>>>>> the > >>>>>>> site goal. I might be able to take another look this Friday. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Matt > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, 2:54 AM Thomas Andraschko < > >>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 2018-08-22 9:52 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau < > [email protected] > >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > >>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau < > >>>>>> https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>> | Blog > >>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/ < > >>>>>> https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/>> | Old Blog > >>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com < > >>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>> > >>>>>> | Github <https://github.com/ <https://github.com/> > >>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> | > >>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau < > >>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>> | Book > >>>>>>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- < > >>>>>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-> > >>>>>>>>> ee-8-high-performance> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Le mer. 22 août 2018 à 09:46, Mark Struberg > >>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>> écrit : > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> hi folks! > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Do we want to go for a BVal-2.0.0 release? > >>>>>>>>>> Seems we pass the TCK, so we should really kick it off I'd say. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Wdyt? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, > >>>>>>>>>> strub > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
