right, same approach as I did. LieGrue, strub
> Am 10.09.2018 um 18:32 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > > For the ones I did, I just wrote it with "my words". This is not part of > the signature so technically you can write a summary of your holidays > (don't please ;)). > If you have time let's enhance it, if not we can do a .0.1 for it, no issue > and happy to lead this next release if needed. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le lun. 10 sept. 2018 à 14:45, Matt Benson <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> The Geronimo versions of the v1.x specs never had any Javadoc to speak of. >> This seems to be a problematic area anyway: how to document an API without >> infringing the copyright of the reference API. >> >> Matt >> >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018, 2:05 AM Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> wohuuu, trying to make up a bit time today or tomorrow to push the >>> geronimo-validation_2.0_spec release. >>> >>> If you want to add some JavaDocs before that then plz ping me and I wait >> a >>> bit. >>> Need to run the compat checks anyway before we can ship it. >>> >>> LieGrue, >>> strub >>> >>>> Am 28.08.2018 um 15:57 schrieb Matt Benson <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> Good catch, Mark! Thanks! >>>> >>>> Matt >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 6:53 AM Mark Struberg >> <[email protected] >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We also need to release geronimo-validation-2.0. Will trigger this >> over >>> at >>>>> Geronimo. >>>>> >>>>> LieGrue, >>>>> strub >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Am 27.08.2018 um 20:32 schrieb Roberto Cortez >>>>> <[email protected]>: >>>>>> >>>>>> Great. Let me know if I can help. >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 27 Aug 2018, at 16:10, Matt Benson <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sounds like the basic plan, yes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Matt >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 4:55 AM Roberto Cortez >>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Great! Thanks. >>>>>>>> So, do you think we can push for a Weaver release, so we can then >>> push >>>>> the >>>>>>>> BVal release? We are trying to push for a TomEE 8 release, so we >> need >>>>> both >>>>>>>> :) >>>>>>>> Cheers,Roberto >>>>>>>> On Friday, August 24, 2018, 10:20:17 PM GMT+1, Matt Benson < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, merged! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018, 12:45 PM Roberto Cortez >>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I had a look and I think the issue is related with this: >>>>>>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg63326.html >> < >>>>>>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg63326.html >>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think this should do the trick: >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/commons-weaver/pull/1 < >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/commons-weaver/pull/1> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Not sure if the report should be visible in the aggregator >> project. >>> I >>>>>>>>> think not. At least I was able to see the report in the processor >>>>>>>> project. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hope it helps! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> Roberto >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm still trying to find time to finish the 1.4 release of >> Commons >>>>>>>>> Weaver. >>>>>>>>>> I thought it was ready, but since traffic on the Commons ML >> alerted >>>>> me >>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>> I should double check that the japicmp report is actually running >>>>> with >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> site goal. I might be able to take another look this Friday. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Matt >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, 2:54 AM Thomas Andraschko < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected] >>>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2018-08-22 9:52 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau < >>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau < >>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>> | Blog >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/ < >>>>>>>>> https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/>> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com < >>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>> >>>>>>>>> | Github <https://github.com/ <https://github.com/> >>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau < >>>>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>> | Book >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- < >>>>>>>>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-> >>>>>>>>>>>> ee-8-high-performance> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Le mer. 22 août 2018 à 09:46, Mark Struberg >>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>> écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> hi folks! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we want to go for a BVal-2.0.0 release? >>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems we pass the TCK, so we should really kick it off I'd >> say. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Wdyt? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>
