bval 2.0 won't be integrated? why? Oo Am Mi., 26. Sep. 2018 um 14:50 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < [email protected]>:
> same here, it will likely not be integrated in tomee 8 anyway. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le mer. 26 sept. 2018 à 14:47, Matt Benson <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > I think Mark and Romain were pushing to get a patch of Javadoc for the > > Geronimo-published version of the bean validation v2 API (first). I > haven't > > had time to do this myself and see it as non-essential. > > > > Matt > > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018, 8:13 PM Roberto Cortez <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > Do you need any help to push the release forward? > > > Cheers,Roberto > > > On Wednesday, September 12, 2018, 7:59:20 AM GMT+1, Mark Struberg > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > right, same approach as I did. > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > strub > > > > > > > > > > Am 10.09.2018 um 18:32 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > > [email protected] > > > >: > > > > > > > > For the ones I did, I just wrote it with "my words". This is not part > > of > > > > the signature so technically you can write a summary of your holidays > > > > (don't please ;)). > > > > If you have time let's enhance it, if not we can do a .0.1 for it, no > > > issue > > > > and happy to lead this next release if needed. > > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > > > < > > > > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le lun. 10 sept. 2018 à 14:45, Matt Benson <[email protected]> a > > écrit > > > : > > > > > > > >> The Geronimo versions of the v1.x specs never had any Javadoc to > speak > > > of. > > > >> This seems to be a problematic area anyway: how to document an API > > > without > > > >> infringing the copyright of the reference API. > > > >> > > > >> Matt > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018, 2:05 AM Mark Struberg > <[email protected] > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> wohuuu, trying to make up a bit time today or tomorrow to push the > > > >>> geronimo-validation_2.0_spec release. > > > >>> > > > >>> If you want to add some JavaDocs before that then plz ping me and I > > > wait > > > >> a > > > >>> bit. > > > >>> Need to run the compat checks anyway before we can ship it. > > > >>> > > > >>> LieGrue, > > > >>> strub > > > >>> > > > >>>> Am 28.08.2018 um 15:57 schrieb Matt Benson <[email protected]>: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Good catch, Mark! Thanks! > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Matt > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 6:53 AM Mark Struberg > > > >> <[email protected] > > > >>>> > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> We also need to release geronimo-validation-2.0. Will trigger > this > > > >> over > > > >>> at > > > >>>>> Geronimo. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> LieGrue, > > > >>>>> strub > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> Am 27.08.2018 um 20:32 schrieb Roberto Cortez > > > >>>>> <[email protected]>: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Great. Let me know if I can help. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On 27 Aug 2018, at 16:10, Matt Benson <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Sounds like the basic plan, yes. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Matt > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 4:55 AM Roberto Cortez > > > >>>>> <[email protected]> > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Great! Thanks. > > > >>>>>>>> So, do you think we can push for a Weaver release, so we can > > then > > > >>> push > > > >>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>> BVal release? We are trying to push for a TomEE 8 release, so > we > > > >> need > > > >>>>> both > > > >>>>>>>> :) > > > >>>>>>>> Cheers,Roberto > > > >>>>>>>> On Friday, August 24, 2018, 10:20:17 PM GMT+1, Matt Benson < > > > >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Thanks, merged! > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018, 12:45 PM Roberto Cortez > > > >>>>> <[email protected] > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> I had a look and I think the issue is related with this: > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg63326.html > > > >> < > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg63326.html > > > >>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> I think this should do the trick: > > > >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/commons-weaver/pull/1 < > > > >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/commons-weaver/pull/1> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Not sure if the report should be visible in the aggregator > > > >> project. > > > >>> I > > > >>>>>>>>> think not. At least I was able to see the report in the > > processor > > > >>>>>>>> project. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Hope it helps! > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>>>>>> Roberto > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I'm still trying to find time to finish the 1.4 release of > > > >> Commons > > > >>>>>>>>> Weaver. > > > >>>>>>>>>> I thought it was ready, but since traffic on the Commons ML > > > >> alerted > > > >>>>> me > > > >>>>>>>>> that > > > >>>>>>>>>> I should double check that the japicmp report is actually > > > running > > > >>>>> with > > > >>>>>>>>> the > > > >>>>>>>>>> site goal. I might be able to take another look this Friday. > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Matt > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, 2:54 AM Thomas Andraschko < > > > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto: > > [email protected] > > > >>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> 2018-08-22 9:52 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau < > > > >>> [email protected] > > > >>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>: > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau < > > > >>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>> | Blog > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/ < > > > >>>>>>>>> https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/>> | Old Blog > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com < > > > >>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>> > > > >>>>>>>>> | Github <https://github.com/ <https://github.com/> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> | > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau < > > > >>>>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>> | Book > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- < > > > >>>>>>>>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> ee-8-high-performance> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Le mer. 22 août 2018 à 09:46, Mark Struberg > > > >>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected] > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> a > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> écrit : > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> hi folks! > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we want to go for a BVal-2.0.0 release? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems we pass the TCK, so we should really kick it off > I'd > > > >> say. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Wdyt? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> strub > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > >
