Hi, Since there is a single fix ( https://github.com/apache/bval/commit/aec60e7785e4f45d27336072c526de65bc47aaad) - plus OSGi metadata upgrade, I think a patch version is sufficient since user impact/breaking change is not expected (outside OSGi but this part is ok as a patch IMHO).
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le lun. 8 juil. 2024 à 12:39, Markus Jung <ju...@apache.org> a écrit : > Hey all, > > > with my new committer privileges I'd like to run this release and act as > the release manager. Can we get consensus that we do want to release and > on which version? 3.0.1/3.1.0 or maybe both? > > To do this I also need someone from PMC to assist me by adding my > signing key to dist.a.o as well as publishing the release after a > potential vote passed. > > > Thanks > > Markus > > On 18.06.24 13:25, Markus Jung wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > > > it's been quite some time since BVal 3.0.0 was released, would it be > > possible to release BVal 3.0.1 some time? Right now there have been > > 118 commits [1] since 3.0.0 was released. Most of these have been > > dependabot commits but especially BVAL-220 (which fixes some > > compatibility issues with newer Java SE Versions) could justify a > > release on its own IMO. WDYT? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Markus > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/bval/compare/3.0.0...master > > >
