then +1 for 3.0.1 for now

Am Mo., 8. Juli 2024 um 15:13 Uhr schrieb Markus Jung <ju...@apache.org>:

> Actually we can't release 3.1.0 right now, the Validation 3.1 TCK is
> still stuck in a staging repo:
>
> https://github.com/apache/bval/blob/a558aac66a917cf89cc6c0bd12e1ae43ac838dc5/bval-tck/pom.xml#L315-L326
>
> So our only option is to release 3.0.1. Can we get consensus on doing so?
>
>
> On 08.07.24 12:39, Markus Jung wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> >
> > with my new committer privileges I'd like to run this release and act
> > as the release manager. Can we get consensus that we do want to
> > release and on which version? 3.0.1/3.1.0 or maybe both?
> >
> > To do this I also need someone from PMC to assist me by adding my
> > signing key to dist.a.o as well as publishing the release after a
> > potential vote passed.
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Markus
> >
> > On 18.06.24 13:25, Markus Jung wrote:
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >>
> >> it's been quite some time since BVal 3.0.0 was released, would it be
> >> possible to release BVal 3.0.1 some time? Right now there have been
> >> 118 commits [1] since 3.0.0 was released. Most of these have been
> >> dependabot commits but especially BVAL-220 (which fixes some
> >> compatibility issues with newer Java SE Versions) could justify a
> >> release on its own IMO. WDYT?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >> Markus
> >>
> >>
> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/bval/compare/3.0.0...master
> >>
>

Reply via email to