https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-948 that fixed the problem with the RelFieldTrimmer went in yesterday. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 have gone in too.
I think we can probably check in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-949, and start with the vote for the release. -- Jesús On 11/3/15, 4:34 PM, "Jesus Camacho Rodriguez" <[email protected]> wrote: >Thanks Julian. > >I will try to start the vote tomorrow; I'm still trying to figure out if the >problem with in RelFieldTrimmer is in Calcite or Hive specific (because of the >special treatment that we do of grouping ID). > >-- >Jesús > > > >On 11/2/15, 8:15 PM, "Julian Hyde" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Welcome back, Jesus. >> >>Where are we on the release? From my end, I am still not ready to >>check in the branch for >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 and I think it will >>cause some destabilization when it goes in. I checked in a lot of >>patches in the last week or so and I think the master branch is in >>good shape. >> >>I think it is in the best interests of the project to make a release >>with what we have now; we can make a short release when 816 is ready >>and stable. >> >>There are outstanding patches from Maryann ( >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 ) and Navis ( >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 ) which are low risk >>and could go in before a vote. >> >>Julian >> >> >>On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez >><[email protected]> wrote: >>> Catching up with the release, as I was on vacation last week. >>> >>> I am tracking an issue in RelFieldTrimmer that I have detected in Hive QA >>> run (seems related to Aggregate operators and grouping sets treatment). I >>> will post another update asap. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jesús >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10/28/15, 3:22 AM, "Josh Elser" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>>https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/140 should be up to date for >>>>CALCITE-903 >>>> >>>>Josh Elser wrote: >>>>> Thanks, Julian. >>>>> >>>>> I'm hoping on a patch for tmrw. Still working through fallout from the >>>>> patch being out of date. >>>>> >>>>> Julian Hyde wrote: >>>>>> 938 and PR 160 are now both in. >>>>>> >>>>>> Next up… 903, Josh? >>>>>> >>>>>> Also hoping for 911 from Jinfeng and 936 from Navis. >>>>>> >>>>>> Julian >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Maryann Xue<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just created and submitted patch for CALCITE-938. Would be great if that >>>>>>> one could be included in 1.5. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Maryann >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Julian Hyde<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks Josh. Reviewing PR 160 now. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Assignments: >>>>>>>>>> * Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> FYI 921, 913 and 871 are contained in >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/160 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> CALCITE-903 is going to take a day or so after CALCITE-705. I wasn't >>>>>>>>> watching close enough and the original patch is rather out of date >>>>>>>>> now. >>>>>> >>>> >>
