Draft release notes here: https://github.com/julianhyde/calcite/blob/branch-1.5/site/_docs/history.md <https://github.com/julianhyde/calcite/blob/branch-1.5/site/_docs/history.md>
Apache have just changed their git policy: previously you could alter history (delete branch or force push) on any branch other than master. Now you cannot alter history on any branch. Shame, because you used to be able to make any mess you liked on a release staging branch and clean it up just before the release. Julian > On Nov 4, 2015, at 1:28 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > > I just committed 845, 951, 952. Just 949 left. > > I’ll also write some draft release notes. > > Julian > > >> On Nov 4, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I am testing 845 now and will shortly commit. And I think 948, 949, 951, 952 >> should go in. (They need to be reviewed first.) >> >> Everything else should wait. Including 816 and 911. >> >> Anyone disagree? >> >> Julian >> >> >>> On Nov 4, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Maryann Xue <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Just submitted a patch for CALCITE-952, which is related to CALCITE-890. >>> Hope it can go into the release. >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I just threw up one more/last Avatica fix that I apparently goofed/omitted >>>> the first time around. Rather trivial changes, but I can understand the >>>> need to say no and stop bringing in new stuff :) >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-951 >>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/165 >>>> >>>> >>>> Jesus Camacho Rodriguez wrote: >>>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-948 that fixed the problem >>>>> with the RelFieldTrimmer went in yesterday. >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 and >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 have gone in too. >>>>> >>>>> I think we can probably check in >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-949, and start with the >>>>> vote for the release. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jesús >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 11/3/15, 4:34 PM, "Jesus Camacho Rodriguez"< >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Julian. >>>>>> >>>>>> I will try to start the vote tomorrow; I'm still trying to figure out if >>>>>> the problem with in RelFieldTrimmer is in Calcite or Hive specific >>>>>> (because >>>>>> of the special treatment that we do of grouping ID). >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Jesús >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 11/2/15, 8:15 PM, "Julian Hyde"<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Welcome back, Jesus. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Where are we on the release? From my end, I am still not ready to >>>>>>> check in the branch for >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-816 and I think it will >>>>>>> cause some destabilization when it goes in. I checked in a lot of >>>>>>> patches in the last week or so and I think the master branch is in >>>>>>> good shape. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think it is in the best interests of the project to make a release >>>>>>> with what we have now; we can make a short release when 816 is ready >>>>>>> and stable. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There are outstanding patches from Maryann ( >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-845 and >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-890 ) and Navis ( >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-936 ) which are low risk >>>>>>> and could go in before a vote. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Julian >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Jesus Camacho Rodriguez >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Catching up with the release, as I was on vacation last week. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am tracking an issue in RelFieldTrimmer that I have detected in Hive >>>>>>>> QA run (seems related to Aggregate operators and grouping sets >>>>>>>> treatment). >>>>>>>> I will post another update asap. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Jesús >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 10/28/15, 3:22 AM, "Josh Elser"<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/140 should be up to date for >>>>>>>>> CALCITE-903 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Josh Elser wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, Julian. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm hoping on a patch for tmrw. Still working through fallout from >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> patch being out of date. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 938 and PR 160 are now both in. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Next up… 903, Josh? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Also hoping for 911 from Jinfeng and 936 from Navis. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Julian >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 26, 2015, at 12:07 PM, Maryann Xue<[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Just created and submitted patch for CALCITE-938. Would be great >>>>>>>>>>>> if that >>>>>>>>>>>> one could be included in 1.5. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>> Maryann >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Julian Hyde<[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Josh. Reviewing PR 160 now. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian Hyde wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great. I've listed your assignments (and everyone else's) below. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assignments: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Josh: 921, 913, 871, 903 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> FYI 921, 913 and 871 are contained in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/160 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-903 is going to take a day or so after CALCITE-705. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wasn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>> watching close enough and the original patch is rather out of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> date >>>>>>>>>>>>>> now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
