An update on release 1.15. We’re still on track for first RC on Monday. We never seem to do a good job of verifying Calcite’s adapters. Can I have volunteers to validate the Cassandra, Mongo, and Druid adapters? I plan to test Calcite on Windows.
The following issues remain for the release: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-707 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-707> Server and DDL (julian) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2018 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2018> AssertionError: rel has lower cost (julian to review PR #552) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2041 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2041> Adding the ability to turn off nullability matching (julian to review PR #563 and #570) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2054 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2054> UPDATE with parameters (julian to review PR #568) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2061 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2061> Parameters in OFFSET and FETCH (julian to review PR #569) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1861 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1861> Spatial indexes https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1616 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1616> Data profiler All are “best effort”; i.e. they may not make it into the release. Can someone please review 707? It is an important change. Julian > On Nov 14, 2017, at 12:37 PM, Michael Mior <[email protected]> wrote: > > I looks like there are significant version upgrades available for libraries > in use within adapters. Those would probably be good to include as well. > (The MongoDB driver in particular is three years out of date.) > > -- > Michael Mior > [email protected] > > 2017-11-14 14:51 GMT-05:00 Julian Hyde <[email protected]>: > >> I have logged https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2049 < >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2049>, “Release Calcite >> 1.15.0”. Please follow that to get updates on the state of the release. >> >> Vova, I would like to include https://issues.apache.org/ >> jira/browse/CALCITE-2018 <https://issues.apache.org/ >> jira/browse/CALCITE-2018> too. I will definitely review your pull >> request. Sorry it’s taken me a while. >> >> Everyone, please look at https://issues.apache.org/ >> jira/browse/CALCITE-2027 <https://issues.apache.org/ >> jira/browse/CALCITE-2027>, specifically the list of other technologies I >> would like to upgrade (guava, jetty, jackson, panino, h2, hsqldb, javacc, >> maven) or change the “preferred” version. If there are other libraries we >> should upgrade, let’s discuss. At this stage I would like to be ambitious, >> and upgrade as far as we can. >> >> Julian >> >> >>> On Nov 14, 2017, at 7:29 AM, Michael Mior <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Sounds good to me. I have nothing in particular I'm hoping to include. >>> Looking forward to ditching JDK 7 :) >>> >>> -- >>> Michael Mior >>> [email protected] >>> >>> 2017-11-13 22:46 GMT-05:00 Julian Hyde <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> Last release (1.14) was on 2nd October. I think we should aim for a >>>> release 1.15 in early December (which means starting an RC vote around >>>> November 27), and I volunteer to be release manager. >>>> >>>> Does this timing work for everyone? >>>> >>>> Any particular features that people would like to include? >>>> >>>> I would like to announce that this will be the last release that will >>>> support JDK 7[1]. >>>> >>>> Julian >>>> >>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027 < >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027> >> >>
