I ran tests for the Cassandra adapter. I'll try to do this for a few others
as well.

--
Michael Mior
mm...@apache.org

2017-11-27 14:19 GMT-05:00 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>:

> I’ve just committed 707 and 2061. That leaves the following:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2018 AssertionError: rel
> has lower cost (julian to review PR #552)
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2054 UPDATE with parameters
> (julian to review PR #568)
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1861 Spatial indexes
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1616 Data profiler
>
> Also seeing some minor issues in Windows, and possibly a performance
> regression in RelMetadataTest.testPullUpPredicatesForExprsItr.
>
> First RC probably tomorrow. Not all of the above will make the cut.
>
> Has anyone had chance to test any of the adapters?
>
> We’re trying to get to stable, so please don’t make commits without my +1
> (I have been running exhaustive tests before committing).
>
> Julian
>
>
>
> > On Nov 27, 2017, at 11:10 AM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for reviewing, Michael. Yes, it’s a lot.
> >
> > Materialized views were a big motivation for doing this. You currently
> have to do some tricky work with APIs to define materialized views
> (mappings inside the planner, predicates, statistics). I wanted to
> demonstrate it working using a few lines of SQL.
> >
> > I hadn’t really thought of DDL + adapters. Yes, I guess someone could do
> >
> >  CREATE TABLE MyCassandraSchema.MyTable (int i, date j)
> >
> > and Calcite would create a table in Cassandra. We’d need to add SPIs to
> Schema to make that work.
> >
> > Julian
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Nov 23, 2017, at 9:00 AM, Michael Mior <mm...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> >>
> >> Reviewed 707. It's a lot of code, so I can't say I did a particularly
> >> thorough job, but no clear issues stuck out to me and the approach seems
> >> sound. Glad to see materialized views are included in there. Not
> suggesting
> >> this should be part of 707, but looking forward to having some adapters
> >> implement basic DDL in the future. It won't make sense for all of them,
> but
> >> I can certainly see it being useful. Awesome work!
> >>
> >> --
> >> Michael Mior
> >> mm...@apache.org
> >>
> >> 2017-11-22 18:28 GMT-05:00 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>:
> >>
> >>> An update on release 1.15. We’re still on track for first RC on Monday.
> >>>
> >>> We never seem to do a good job of verifying Calcite’s adapters. Can I
> have
> >>> volunteers to validate the Cassandra, Mongo, and Druid adapters? I
> plan to
> >>> test Calcite on Windows.
> >>>
> >>> The following issues remain for the release:
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-707 <
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-707> Server and DDL
> (julian)
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2018 <
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2018> AssertionError:
> rel
> >>> has lower cost (julian to review PR #552)
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2041 <
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2041> Adding the
> ability to
> >>> turn off nullability matching (julian to review PR #563 and #570)
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2054 <
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2054> UPDATE with
> >>> parameters (julian to review PR #568)
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2061 <
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2061> Parameters in
> OFFSET
> >>> and FETCH (julian to review PR #569)
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1861 <
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1861> Spatial indexes
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1616 <
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1616> Data profiler
> >>>
> >>> All are “best effort”; i.e. they may not make it into the release.
> >>>
> >>> Can someone please review 707? It is an important change.
> >>>
> >>> Julian
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Nov 14, 2017, at 12:37 PM, Michael Mior <mm...@uwaterloo.ca>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I looks like there are significant version upgrades available for
> >>> libraries
> >>>> in use within adapters. Those would probably be good to include as
> well.
> >>>> (The MongoDB driver in particular is three years out of date.)
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Michael Mior
> >>>> mm...@apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>> 2017-11-14 14:51 GMT-05:00 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I have logged https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2049 <
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2049>, “Release
> Calcite
> >>>>> 1.15.0”. Please follow that to get updates on the state of the
> release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Vova, I would like to include https://issues.apache.org/
> >>>>> jira/browse/CALCITE-2018 <https://issues.apache.org/
> >>>>> jira/browse/CALCITE-2018> too. I will definitely review your pull
> >>>>> request. Sorry it’s taken me a while.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Everyone, please look at https://issues.apache.org/
> >>>>> jira/browse/CALCITE-2027 <https://issues.apache.org/
> >>>>> jira/browse/CALCITE-2027>, specifically the list of other
> technologies I
> >>>>> would like to upgrade (guava, jetty, jackson, panino, h2, hsqldb,
> >>> javacc,
> >>>>> maven) or change the “preferred” version. If there are other
> libraries
> >>> we
> >>>>> should upgrade, let’s discuss. At this stage I would like to be
> >>> ambitious,
> >>>>> and upgrade as far as we can.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Julian
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Nov 14, 2017, at 7:29 AM, Michael Mior <mm...@uwaterloo.ca>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sounds good to me. I have nothing in particular I'm hoping to
> include.
> >>>>>> Looking forward to ditching JDK 7 :)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Michael Mior
> >>>>>> mm...@apache.org
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2017-11-13 22:46 GMT-05:00 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Last release (1.14) was on 2nd October. I think we should aim for a
> >>>>>>> release 1.15 in early December (which means starting an RC vote
> around
> >>>>>>> November 27), and I volunteer to be release manager.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Does this timing work for everyone?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Any particular features that people would like to include?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I would like to announce that this will be the last release that
> will
> >>>>>>> support JDK 7[1].
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Julian
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027 <
> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2027>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>
>

Reply via email to