Yea I don't mind pushing out the RC towards the end of next week (beginning of March). I'm not in a rush to build the RC. I just picked Monday to try to hit the target of February that was arbitrarily picked in the sand. At this point, the release will most likely happen in early March.
Kevin Risden On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 4:15 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: > Can you do the RC towards the end of next week? > > I only just saw this message - 4 days after you sent it - because I’ve > been fighting down a backlog of 500 Apache messages. There are some changes > I would like to get into the release but I will need a few days. > > Julian > > > > On Feb 18, 2019, at 9:56 AM, > Kevin Risden > <kris...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > It looks like there are some PRs to be reviewed and some changes to get > > merged in this week. > > > > How does creating the first RC on Monday Feb 25th sound? Does that give > > enough time this week to get changes into Calcite 1.19.0? > > > > Kevin Risden > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:08 AM Zoltan Haindrich <k...@rxd.hu> wrote: > > > >> > >> On 2/13/19 4:24 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > >>> Sorry, there’s been a misunderstanding. Let me clarify. I didn’t say > >> that your patches were too small. Or intend to imply it. > >>> > >>> When I said “widespread changes for no good reason” - or something like > >> that - I meant changes to the RexNode format due to removing IS TRUE > nodes. > >>> > >>> I like small patches, provided each one fixes a well defined issue and > >> has appropriate tests. > >> > >> From now on I will try to provide a testcase when opening the jira. > >> Sorry for the misunderstanding, thank you for making it clear! > >> > >>> > >>> Julian > >>> > >>>> On Feb 13, 2019, at 3:40 AM, Zoltan Haindrich <k...@rxd.hu> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hello, > >>>> > >>>> In Hive I'm a little bit behind in upgrading to 1.18 and although the > >> upgrade would not cause any correctness issues; but in a sense it's more > >> conservative in doing some simplifications - which could be interpreted > as > >> regressions; if we take that into account that even the plan could get > >> worse. > >>>> > >>>> I've a few patches almost ready - they are very small changes > (actually > >> Julian mentioned that they are kinda too small, so next time I will not > be > >> opening separate jiras for them) > >>>> > >>>> I will finish them and launch a custom Hive test with the latest > master > >> to see if there are any new issues coming from that direction. > >>>> I should get the results for it by tomorrow. > >>>> > >>>> cheers, > >>>> Zoltan > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On 2/12/19 11:30 PM, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote: > >>>>> I was not suggesting changing the release process. I wanted just to > >>>>> highlight the fact that if the aforementioned tickets are not part of > >> 1.19 > >>>>> I will have to create an unofficial bundle which includes them in > >> order to > >>>>> keep the downstream project working. Sorry for the confusion. > >>>>> Στις Τρί, 12 Φεβ 2019 στις 8:56 μ.μ., ο/η Julian Hyde < > >> jh...@apache.org> > >>>>> έγραψε: > >>>>>> Stamatis, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We’ve so far managed to avoid making patch releases. It keeps life > >> simpler > >>>>>> if all releases are from the main line. And simple is important, > >> given that > >>>>>> there are no salaried release or QA engineers working on Calcite. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> But as part of that contract, we commit to making releases from main > >> line > >>>>>> frequently and regularly. Hopefully 1.19 will arrive soon enough for > >> your > >>>>>> purposes. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Julian > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Feb 12, 2019, at 5:27 AM, Stamatis Zampetakis < > zabe...@gmail.com> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> In order to enable Calcite on a downstream project I need to patch > >>>>>>> the official release with the PRs of the following Jiras. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [CALCITE-2464] Allow to set nullability for columns of structured > >> types > >>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>> [CALCITE-2677] Struct types with one field are not mapped correctly > >> to > >>>>>> Java > >>>>>>> Classes [2] > >>>>>>> [CALCITE-2776] Wrong value when accessing struct types with one > >> attribute > >>>>>>> [3] > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I think the discussion has advanced quite a lot for CALCITE-2464 > so I > >>>>>> could > >>>>>>> probably take it on my self, > >>>>>>> but I would really appreciate some input regarding CALCITE-2677 and > >>>>>>> CALCITE-2776. > >>>>>>> Let's continue the discussion under the respective Jiras. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>> Stamatis > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [1] https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2464 > >>>>>>> [2] https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2677 > >>>>>>> [3] https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2776 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Στις Δευ, 11 Φεβ 2019 στις 9:49 μ.μ., ο/η Francis Chuang < > >>>>>>> francischu...@apache.org> έγραψε: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks for getting this started, Kevin! > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 12/02/2019 6:39 am, Julian Hyde wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> Are there any JIRA cases that should make it into 1.19.0 but > are > >> not > >>>>>>>> yet > >>>>>>>>>>> finished? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Yes - there are a lot cases that have a PR ready that have not > been > >>>>>>>> reviewed / committed. We, the committers, will need to make a team > >>>>>> effort > >>>>>>>> to get as many of these in as possible. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Julian > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Feb 11, 2019, at 11:05 AM, Michael Mior <mm...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for getting the ball rolling Kevin! > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> Michael Mior > >>>>>>>>>> mm...@apache.org > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 09:51, > >> Kevin Risden > >> <kris...@apache.org> a > >>>>>>>> écrit : > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Calcite 1.18.0 was released on 2018-12 (coming up on 2 months > >> ago). > >>>>>> It > >>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>> time to get the ball rolling for the Calcite 1.19.0 release > since > >>>>>> there > >>>>>>>>>>> have been releases every 2-3 months. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Calcite currently has 32 JIRA issues tagged for 1.19.0 with 68 > >>>>>> commits. > >>>>>>>>>>> Avatica currently has 2 JIRA issues tagged for avatica-1.14.0 > >> with 8 > >>>>>>>>>>> commits. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Are there any JIRA cases that should make it into 1.19.0 but > are > >> not > >>>>>>>> yet > >>>>>>>>>>> finished? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Since there are only two minor commits to Avatica I don't think > >> we > >>>>>>>> need a > >>>>>>>>>>> new Avatica release before the Calcite release. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Kevin Risden > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >> > >
