As of this morning, all JIRAs tagged for 1.19.0 have been resolved or moved out to 1.20.0.
I will be starting the release steps this morning. Please hold off on commits to master while the 1.19.0 release is happening. Kevin Risden On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 9:02 AM Kevin Risden <kris...@apache.org> wrote: > It looks like we haven't made any progress (JIRAs have been opened/closed) > towards closing down JIRAs tagged for 1.19.0. There are still 14 (14 on > 2/27) open JIRAs tagged for 1.19.0. > > I will start moving those JIRAs out today to 1.20.0 so I can start to > close those this release. We are getting to mid March at this point since > we keep postponing this release. > > Kevin Risden > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 5:55 AM YuZhao Chan <yuzhao....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I would help to review some PRs this weekend，especially [1]. Hope to help >> and release some of the burden. >> [1] >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2018?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(EMPTY%2C%20%22next%22)%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20pull-request-available%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC >> >> Best, >> YuZhao Chan >> 在 2019年2月26日 +0800 AM8:14，Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>，写道： >> > Hey everyone. >> > >> > There are 108 open pull requests. What are we going to do about it? >> > >> > Last release I reviewed and committed dozens of pull requests, and I >> burned out. >> > >> > Julian >> > >> > >> > > On Feb 22, 2019, at 1:20 PM, >> Kevin Risden >> <kris...@apache.org> wrote: >> > > >> > > Yea I don't mind pushing out the RC towards the end of next week >> (beginning >> > > of March). I'm not in a rush to build the RC. I just picked Monday to >> try >> > > to hit the target of February that was arbitrarily picked in the >> sand. At >> > > this point, the release will most likely happen in early March. >> > > >> > > Kevin Risden >> > > >> > > >> > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 4:15 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Can you do the RC towards the end of next week? >> > > > >> > > > I only just saw this message - 4 days after you sent it - because >> I’ve >> > > > been fighting down a backlog of 500 Apache messages. There are some >> changes >> > > > I would like to get into the release but I will need a few days. >> > > > >> > > > Julian >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > On Feb 18, 2019, at 9:56 AM, >> > > > Kevin Risden >> > > > <kris...@apache.org> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > It looks like there are some PRs to be reviewed and some changes >> to get >> > > > > merged in this week. >> > > > > >> > > > > How does creating the first RC on Monday Feb 25th sound? Does >> that give >> > > > > enough time this week to get changes into Calcite 1.19.0? >> > > > > >> > > > > Kevin Risden >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:08 AM Zoltan Haindrich <k...@rxd.hu> >> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On 2/13/19 4:24 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: >> > > > > > > Sorry, there’s been a misunderstanding. Let me clarify. I >> didn’t say >> > > > > > that your patches were too small. Or intend to imply it. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > When I said “widespread changes for no good reason” - or >> something like >> > > > > > that - I meant changes to the RexNode format due to removing IS >> TRUE >> > > > nodes. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I like small patches, provided each one fixes a well defined >> issue and >> > > > > > has appropriate tests. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > From now on I will try to provide a testcase when opening the >> jira. >> > > > > > Sorry for the misunderstanding, thank you for making it clear! >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Julian >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Feb 13, 2019, at 3:40 AM, Zoltan Haindrich <k...@rxd.hu> >> wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hello, >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > In Hive I'm a little bit behind in upgrading to 1.18 and >> although the >> > > > > > upgrade would not cause any correctness issues; but in a sense >> it's more >> > > > > > conservative in doing some simplifications - which could be >> interpreted >> > > > as >> > > > > > regressions; if we take that into account that even the plan >> could get >> > > > > > worse. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I've a few patches almost ready - they are very small >> changes >> > > > (actually >> > > > > > Julian mentioned that they are kinda too small, so next time I >> will not >> > > > be >> > > > > > opening separate jiras for them) >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I will finish them and launch a custom Hive test with the >> latest >> > > > master >> > > > > > to see if there are any new issues coming from that direction. >> > > > > > > > I should get the results for it by tomorrow. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > cheers, >> > > > > > > > Zoltan >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On 2/12/19 11:30 PM, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote: >> > > > > > > > > I was not suggesting changing the release process. I >> wanted just to >> > > > > > > > > highlight the fact that if the aforementioned tickets are >> not part of >> > > > > > 1.19 >> > > > > > > > > I will have to create an unofficial bundle which includes >> them in >> > > > > > order to >> > > > > > > > > keep the downstream project working. Sorry for the >> confusion. >> > > > > > > > > Στις Τρί, 12 Φεβ 2019 στις 8:56 μ.μ., ο/η Julian Hyde < >> > > > > > jh...@apache.org> >> > > > > > > > > έγραψε: >> > > > > > > > > > Stamatis, >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > We’ve so far managed to avoid making patch releases. It >> keeps life >> > > > > > simpler >> > > > > > > > > > if all releases are from the main line. And simple is >> important, >> > > > > > given that >> > > > > > > > > > there are no salaried release or QA engineers working >> on Calcite. >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > But as part of that contract, we commit to making >> releases from main >> > > > > > line >> > > > > > > > > > frequently and regularly. Hopefully 1.19 will arrive >> soon enough for >> > > > > > your >> > > > > > > > > > purposes. >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Julian >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 12, 2019, at 5:27 AM, Stamatis Zampetakis < >> > > > zabe...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > In order to enable Calcite on a downstream project I >> need to patch >> > > > > > > > > > > the official release with the PRs of the following >> Jiras. >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > [CALCITE-2464] Allow to set nullability for columns >> of structured >> > > > > > types >> > > > > > > > > > [1] >> > > > > > > > > > > [CALCITE-2677] Struct types with one field are not >> mapped correctly >> > > > > > to >> > > > > > > > > > Java >> > > > > > > > > > > Classes [2] >> > > > > > > > > > > [CALCITE-2776] Wrong value when accessing struct >> types with one >> > > > > > attribute >> > > > > > > > > > > [3] >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > I think the discussion has advanced quite a lot for >> CALCITE-2464 >> > > > so I >> > > > > > > > > > could >> > > > > > > > > > > probably take it on my self, >> > > > > > > > > > > but I would really appreciate some input regarding >> CALCITE-2677 and >> > > > > > > > > > > CALCITE-2776. >> > > > > > > > > > > Let's continue the discussion under the respective >> Jiras. >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Best, >> > > > > > > > > > > Stamatis >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2464 >> > > > > > > > > > > [2] https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2677 >> > > > > > > > > > > [3] https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2776 >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Στις Δευ, 11 Φεβ 2019 στις 9:49 μ.μ., ο/η Francis >> Chuang < >> > > > > > > > > > > francischu...@apache.org> έγραψε: >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for getting this started, Kevin! >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/02/2019 6:39 am, Julian Hyde wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are there any JIRA cases that should make it >> into 1.19.0 but >> > > > are >> > > > > > not >> > > > > > > > > > > > yet >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > finished? >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes - there are a lot cases that have a PR ready >> that have not >> > > > been >> > > > > > > > > > > > reviewed / committed. We, the committers, will need >> to make a team >> > > > > > > > > > effort >> > > > > > > > > > > > to get as many of these in as possible. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Julian >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 11, 2019, at 11:05 AM, Michael Mior < >> mm...@apache.org> >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for getting the ball rolling Kevin! >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Michael Mior >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > mm...@apache.org >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 09:51, >> > > > > > Kevin Risden >> > > > > > <kris...@apache.org> a >> > > > > > > > > > > > écrit : >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Calcite 1.18.0 was released on 2018-12 >> (coming up on 2 months >> > > > > > ago). >> > > > > > > > > > It >> > > > > > > > > > > > is >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time to get the ball rolling for the Calcite >> 1.19.0 release >> > > > since >> > > > > > > > > > there >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have been releases every 2-3 months. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Calcite currently has 32 JIRA issues tagged >> for 1.19.0 with 68 >> > > > > > > > > > commits. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Avatica currently has 2 JIRA issues tagged >> for avatica-1.14.0 >> > > > > > with 8 >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commits. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are there any JIRA cases that should make it >> into 1.19.0 but >> > > > are >> > > > > > not >> > > > > > > > > > > > yet >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > finished? >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since there are only two minor commits to >> Avatica I don't think >> > > > > > we >> > > > > > > > > > > > need a >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > new Avatica release before the Calcite >> release. >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kevin Risden >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> >
