Project-specific rules are missing, thus general rules apply: https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification , https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
It says: > In this scenario, a negative vote constitutes a veto <https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#Veto> , which cannot be overridden >Under normal (non-lazy consensus) conditions, the proposal requires three positive votes and no negative ones in order to pass I should have declared the vote as lazy consensus, but I realized that only after it was too late. So the effective rules for the current vote are: three +1 to pass, no -1, -1 must be accompanied with a technical justification. My vote is +1, so two more +1 are required. Julian> Assuming that this was a discussion, my “-1” meant “I’m generally against this idea” It is a vote on a code change, thus '-1' implies veto. Julian> without more discussion What do you mean by that? Is the current 'discussion' enough? Vladimir
