Michael> -0 because I haven't found checkstyle violations
Michael> and I don't like the idea of losing checks which are currently in
Michael> place
Would you please re-evaluate? I seems like you did not know which checks
are there and which are not.
To my best knowledge, the only missing check is "Javadoc line too long ({0}
chars)".
However, Checkstyle already has "Line is longer than 100 characters"
warning, so I see no reasons why
extra javadoc-related check is needed.
All the rest are there, and most of the checks are strictly better now.
Can we just commit it and move forward?
Vladimir
