I think that adding '(binding)' is enough to count the votes cast by the PMC.
I am suggesting this because we should encourage people not being committer/PMC member to validate and cast their vote. IMHO Adding too many labels next to the name and the +1 may bias the testing and the validation. Like thinking that the validation from someone is 'better' that the others because it has that label. The same is for -1. Any concerns about the goodness of the release should have the same weight, even if it is coming from a new user. It seems to me that this is an healthy community, and we know each other (no need to check the Apache id) and there is no need to show the labels too much. My 2 cents, from the peanuts gallery Enrico Il Sab 14 Set 2024, 08:57 Francis Chuang <francischu...@apache.org> ha scritto: > +1, this is good for consistency. > > On 14/09/2024 7:22 am, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote: > > It's easier to understand who is who without checking the index [1] > > that I do occasionally. > > > > +1 zabetak (PMC) > > > > [1] https://people.apache.org/committer-index.html > > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 10:16 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> There is a discussion in the Incubator list [1] that proposes a more > >> structured format for the line that people write in their email > >> message when they vote. > >> > >> The problem is that some people use multiple names, email accounts, > >> github accounts, and that tallying votes requires some effort. > >> > >> The proposed solution is that people would use a structured line when > >> they vote, consisting of their vote (-1, 0, +1), their ASF id if they > >> have one, and their role (committer, PMC member, community member). > >> For example, my vote would be > >> > >> +1 jhyde (PMC) > >> > >> In my opinion, Calcite should adopt this. The email starting a vote > >> would recommend that people use that format. Votes would still be > >> counted if people use a different format. > >> > >> What do you think? > >> > >> Julian > >> > >> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/xkfrnt8f733hhokmh0lvyhsn50x4qfw0 > >
