This is a personal subscription? What would be nice is a way for the Apache foundation to own the tokens used for reviewing and probably the machines hosting the agents doing the reviewing. We should investigate if any other Apache project does this.
Mihai ________________________________ From: Alessandro Solimando <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2026 12:49 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Re: Calcite draft board report for 2026 Q4 Re. review bandwidth, yesterday I got an acceptance for https://claude.com/contact-sales/claude-for-oss (never heard back from previous requests), sharing in case it helps, it's 2 minutes to fill in, worth trying. On Sun, 4 Oct 2026 at 13:58, jensen <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > Thanks for your great work! > I agree with ruben. It might be better to start a separate thread. > > > > Best regards, > > Zhen > > ---- 回复的原邮件 ---- > | 发件人 | Francis Chuang<[email protected]> | > | 日期 | 2026年10月04日 18:04 | > | 收件人 | [email protected] | > | 抄送至 | | > | 主题 | Re: Calcite draft board report for 2026 Q4 | > +1, great work, Mihai! > > On 4/10/2026 9:02 pm, Ruben Q L wrote: > > +1 > > Thanks Mihai for preparing this report. > > > > Reviewer scarcity is a recurrent topic. Perhaps we could open a separate > > discuss thread to talk about the matter. > > > > Best, > > Ruben > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 3, 2026 at 5:07 PM Mihai Budiu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I am thinking to add a paragraph about reviewer scarcity; I think we > could > >> use some agentic reviews if they were available, to supplement the human > >> reviews. > >> > >> Mihai > >> ________________________________ > >> From: Alessandro Solimando <[email protected]> > >> Sent: Saturday, October 3, 2026 1:48 AM > >> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: Calcite draft board report for 2026 Q4 > >> > >> +1 on the draft, thanks Mihai for all your hard work > >> > >> On Sat, Oct 3, 2026, 01:08 Mihai Budiu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Here is a draft of the current quarter's board report. > >>> This needs to be submitted by October 14. > >>> Please let me know if you have any suggestions for improvement. > >>> > >>> Thank you, > >>> Mihai > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------- > >>> > >>> Description: > >>> The mission of Calcite is the creation and maintenance of software > >>> related to Dynamic data management framework > >>> Apache Calcite is a highly customizable framework for parsing and > >>> planning queries on data in a wide variety of formats. It allows > >>> database-like access, and in particular a SQL interface and advanced > >>> query optimization, for data not residing in a traditional database. > >>> Avatica is a sub-project within Calcite and provides a framework for > >>> building local and remote JDBC and ODBC database drivers. Avatica has > >>> an independent release schedule and its own repository. > >>> Project Status: > >>> Current project status: ongoing (high activity) > >>> Issues for the board: none > >>> Membership Data: > >>> Apache Calcite was founded 2015-10-21 (11 years ago) > >>> There are currently 82 committers and 32 PMC members in this project. > >>> The Committer-to-PMC ratio is roughly 2.5:1. > >>> Community changes, past quarter: > >>> > >>> * > >>> No new PMC members. Last addition was Zhen Chen on 2026-03-11. > >>> * > >>> Weiqing Zhou was added as committer on 2026-08-22 > >>> * > >>> We have a vote in progress to add another committer > >>> > >>> Project Activity > >>> > >>> * > >>> Calcite 1.42.0 was released on 2026-05-31 > >>> * > >>> Avatica 1.28.0 was released on 2026-05-12 > >>> * > >>> Avatica 1.29.0 was released on 2026-09-20 > >>> > >>> A new Calcite release is planned relatively soon. > >>> Security Response > >>> We have received some reports generated automatically by AI agents > >>> and all the critical and important issues have received patches > >>> or are currently are under review. > >>> Community Health > >>> The community seems very actively engaged. We are seeing a > >>> substantial increase first-time contributions, no doubt due to the > >> barrier > >>> of entry > >>> to contributions being lowered by AI tools. The suprising trend > >>> of closing more tickets than opening has continued into this quarter. > >>> This is due to the dilligence of people like Yu Xu (xuzifu666) who are > >>> closing > >>> old issues. > >>> Community health score: 8.37 (Healthy) > >>> > >>> * > >>> 196 JIRA tickets opened and 204 closed in the past quarter. > >>> * > >>> [email protected] has been flat in the past quarter (334 emails > >>> compared to 336). > >>> * > >>> [email protected] has also been flat (1424 compared to 1441) > >>> > >>> Top committers for last 3 months: > >>> > >> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/graphs/contributors?selectedMetric=commits > >>> 52 mihaibudiu > >>> 27 xuzifu666 > >>> 22 rubenada > >>> 9 zabetak > >>> 7 zzwqqq > >>> 6 tkalkirill > >>> 6 snuyanzin > >>> 5 anxkhn > >>> 5 1fanwang > >>> 4 xiedeyantu > >>> > >>> Most active reviewers in the last 3 months: > >>> 159 mihaibudiu > >>> 71 rubenada > >>> 54 xuzifu666 > >>> 28 sbroeder > >>> 21 zzwqqq > >>> 20 vlsi > >>> 16 julianhyde > >>> 13 wasabii > >>> 11 xiedeyantu > >>> 10 snuyanzin > >>> 9 1fanwang > >>> 8 FrankChen021 > >>> 7 ehds > >>> 6 zabetak > >>> 6 vldpyatkov > >>> 6 copilot-pull-request-reviewer > >>> > >> > > >
