Yes, it's a personal subscription, available for ASF committers only (like
JetBrains licenses and other "perks").

I don't know if there is anything that could be used for a service account,
but I don't think so.

If that existed, the agent could probably run in GH actions maybe?


On Tue, Oct 6, 2026, 18:11 Mihai Budiu <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> This is a personal subscription?
>
> What would be nice is a way for the Apache foundation to own the tokens
> used for reviewing and probably the machines hosting the agents doing the
> reviewing. We should investigate if any other Apache project does this.
>
> Mihai
>
> ________________________________
> From: Alessandro Solimando <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2026 12:49 AM
> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Re: Calcite draft board report for 2026 Q4
>
> Re. review bandwidth, yesterday I got an acceptance for
> https://claude.com/contact-sales/claude-for-oss (never heard back from
> previous requests), sharing in case it helps, it's 2 minutes to fill
> in, worth trying.
>
> On Sun, 4 Oct 2026 at 13:58, jensen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1
> > Thanks for your great work!
> > I agree with ruben. It might be better to start a separate thread.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Zhen
> >
> > ---- 回复的原邮件 ----
> > | 发件人 | Francis Chuang<[email protected]> |
> > | 日期 | 2026年10月04日 18:04 |
> > | 收件人 | [email protected] |
> > | 抄送至 | |
> > | 主题 | Re: Calcite draft board report for 2026 Q4 |
> > +1, great work, Mihai!
> >
> > On 4/10/2026 9:02 pm, Ruben Q L wrote:
> > > +1
> > > Thanks Mihai for preparing this report.
> > >
> > > Reviewer scarcity is a recurrent topic. Perhaps we could open a
> separate
> > > discuss thread to talk about the matter.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Ruben
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 3, 2026 at 5:07 PM Mihai Budiu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I am thinking to add a paragraph about reviewer scarcity; I think we
> > could
> > >> use some agentic reviews if they were available, to supplement the
> human
> > >> reviews.
> > >>
> > >> Mihai
> > >> ________________________________
> > >> From: Alessandro Solimando <[email protected]>
> > >> Sent: Saturday, October 3, 2026 1:48 AM
> > >> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > >> Subject: Re: Calcite draft board report for 2026 Q4
> > >>
> > >> +1 on the draft, thanks Mihai for all your hard work
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Oct 3, 2026, 01:08 Mihai Budiu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Here is a draft of the current quarter's board report.
> > >>> This  needs to be submitted by October 14.
> > >>> Please let me know if you have  any suggestions for improvement.
> > >>>
> > >>> Thank you,
> > >>> Mihai
> > >>>
> > >>> ---------------------------------------
> > >>>
> > >>> Description:
> > >>> The mission of Calcite is the creation and maintenance of software
> > >>> related to Dynamic data management framework
> > >>> Apache Calcite is a highly customizable framework for parsing and
> > >>> planning queries on data in a wide variety of formats. It allows
> > >>> database-like access, and in particular a SQL interface and advanced
> > >>> query optimization, for data not residing in a traditional database.
> > >>> Avatica is a sub-project within Calcite and provides a framework for
> > >>> building local and remote JDBC and ODBC database drivers. Avatica has
> > >>> an independent release schedule and its own repository.
> > >>> Project Status:
> > >>> Current project status: ongoing (high activity)
> > >>> Issues for the board: none
> > >>> Membership Data:
> > >>> Apache Calcite was founded 2015-10-21 (11 years ago)
> > >>> There are currently 82 committers and 32 PMC members in this project.
> > >>> The Committer-to-PMC ratio is roughly 2.5:1.
> > >>> Community changes, past quarter:
> > >>>
> > >>>    *
> > >>> No new PMC members. Last addition was Zhen Chen on 2026-03-11.
> > >>>    *
> > >>> Weiqing Zhou was added as committer on 2026-08-22
> > >>>    *
> > >>> We have a vote in progress to add another committer
> > >>>
> > >>> Project Activity
> > >>>
> > >>>    *
> > >>> Calcite 1.42.0 was released on 2026-05-31
> > >>>    *
> > >>> Avatica 1.28.0 was released on 2026-05-12
> > >>>    *
> > >>> Avatica 1.29.0 was released on 2026-09-20
> > >>>
> > >>> A new Calcite release is planned relatively soon.
> > >>> Security Response
> > >>> We have received some reports generated automatically by AI agents
> > >>> and all the critical and important issues have received patches
> > >>> or are currently are under review.
> > >>> Community Health
> > >>> The community seems very actively engaged. We are seeing a
> > >>> substantial increase first-time contributions, no doubt due to the
> > >> barrier
> > >>> of entry
> > >>> to contributions being lowered by AI tools. The suprising trend
> > >>> of closing more tickets than opening has continued into this quarter.
> > >>> This is due to the dilligence of people like Yu Xu (xuzifu666) who
> are
> > >>> closing
> > >>> old issues.
> > >>> Community health score: 8.37 (Healthy)
> > >>>
> > >>>    *
> > >>> 196 JIRA tickets opened and 204 closed in the past quarter.
> > >>>    *
> > >>> [email protected] has been flat in the past quarter (334 emails
> > >>> compared to 336).
> > >>>    *
> > >>> [email protected] has also been flat (1424 compared to 1441)
> > >>>
> > >>> Top committers for last 3 months:
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/graphs/contributors?selectedMetric=commits
> > >>> 52 mihaibudiu
> > >>> 27 xuzifu666
> > >>> 22 rubenada
> > >>> 9 zabetak
> > >>> 7 zzwqqq
> > >>> 6 tkalkirill
> > >>> 6 snuyanzin
> > >>> 5 anxkhn
> > >>> 5 1fanwang
> > >>> 4 xiedeyantu
> > >>>
> > >>> Most active reviewers in the last 3 months:
> > >>> 159 mihaibudiu
> > >>> 71 rubenada
> > >>> 54 xuzifu666
> > >>> 28 sbroeder
> > >>> 21 zzwqqq
> > >>> 20 vlsi
> > >>> 16 julianhyde
> > >>> 13 wasabii
> > >>> 11 xiedeyantu
> > >>> 10 snuyanzin
> > >>> 9 1fanwang
> > >>> 8 FrankChen021
> > >>> 7 ehds
> > >>> 6 zabetak
> > >>> 6 vldpyatkov
> > >>> 6 copilot-pull-request-reviewer
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to