I’ve just checked in PR 144. What’s next? Bruno’s CALCITE-871? Or suggest something, Josh.
Julian > On Oct 22, 2015, at 5:55 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks Josh. Reviewing & testing now. I'll let you know when it's in, > then we can move onto the next set of patches. > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ok, https://github.com/apache/incubator-calcite/pull/144 should be good to >> go now. It includes Bruno's 912 (with the minor nits you found, Julian, >> fixed, then my 645 and 908. I made some minor modifications over my original >> changes in 645 because we both touched the same code. I think it's a nice >> improvement over what I had initially. >> >> After we get to the protobuf-3-beta, I'll try to coalesce the PRs that >> require recompilation all into one PR to make your life easier, Julian. >> >> I appreciate your legwork. >> >> Julian Hyde wrote: >>> >>> Ah, 645 and 903 also need protobuf changes. They're both yours Josh. >>> Let me know what order you would like me to commit these PRs. >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Julian Hyde<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Because we check in code generated by protobuf, merging commits that >>>> affects protobuf is not possible. (Grrr. I knew there was a reason not to >>>> check in generated code.) >>>> >>>> Several of these patches touch protobuf: including 908, 912, 871 (which >>>> relies on 912). Any more? >>>> >>>> If we want to get all of these patches into 1.5, you will need to be >>>> responsive. >>>> >>>> Josh& Bruno, please get together and figure out which order your patches >>>> should be committed, and email this list when you have the first pull >>>> request. Base it on the latest master, which will shortly contain >>>> CALCITE-927. >>>> >>>> Julian >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Oct 20, 2015, at 12:08 PM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I've been trying to track some of the outstanding pull requests for >>>>> Avatica-related fixes. I'd love to see this list included in 1.5. >>>>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-927 >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-921 >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-919 >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-913 >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-912 >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-908 >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-903 >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-871 >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-645 >>>>> >>>>> I think most of them are in a good position, a few might require some >>>>> more polishing. >>>>> >>>>> - Josh >>>>> >>>>> Julian Hyde wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> When would be a good time for our next release? >>>>>> >>>>>> Here are some dates: >>>>>> * We aim to release "every month or so". >>>>>> * 1.4 was released on 9/2 [1]. >>>>>> * It takes about 2 weeks to release, so if we started today, we could >>>>>> release on about 10/13. >>>>>> * The Apache board meeting is on 10/14 [2] and if the vote to >>>>>> establish Calcite passes we would make our first release as a >>>>>> top-level project as early as 10/21. >>>>>> >>>>>> Does anyone have any other constraints, e.g. features they would like >>>>>> to complete? >>>>>> >>>>>> Jesus, could you take on the release manager role? >>>>>> >>>>>> Julian >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] http://calcite.incubator.apache.org/docs/history.html#v1-4-0 >>>>>> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/board/calendar.html
