This is at least "my" requirement.
Sent from a mobile device
Am 07.08.2012 18:47 schrieb "Scott England-Sullivan" <sully6...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> It sounds like you are looking for something like the following:
>
> from("sjms:consumer?transacted=true&batch=100")
> .processor("do stuff")
> to("file:output");
>
> Such that 100 messages would be consumed, processed and filed followed by
> the session either being committed or rolled back based on the success or
> fail of all 100 exchanges.
>
> Sound about right?
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Thomas Johansen <thxm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure what this implies, Scott.
> >
> > My use case is to have a transaction started on a first exchange, and
> then
> > have X exhanges on the same transaction. It should first be committed
> when
> > some external event happens, like a control message is seen (possibly
> from
> > a separate control queue), after X number of messages or something. I'm
> > sure Camel provides some options for mechanisms to use here? In my case I
> > need to aggregate X records into a single file.
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> >
> > Den 7. aug. 2012 kl. 14:50 skrev Scott England-Sullivan <
> > sully6...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > I will take a look at it tonight. Plan is to add batch support by
> having
> > > the Producer and Consumer endpoints support a List of Messages. Once
> in
> > > place TX would be automatically supported as it is called as a
> > > Synchronization upon completion of the Exchange.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Christian Müller <
> > > christian.muel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1
> > >> Would like to see this feature too...
> > >>
> > >> Sent from a mobile device
> > >> Am 07.08.2012 10:49 schrieb "Thomas Johansen" <thxm...@gmail.com>:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> As I understand the JMSComponent/ActiveMQComponent cannot support
> > batched
> > >>> transactions due to the use of Spring's DMLC. With this new
> > SJMSComponent
> > >>> there should be possibilities to implement this, I guess?
> > >>>
> > >>> BR,
> > >>> Thomas
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > --
> > > Scott England-Sullivan
> > > ----------------------------------
> > > FuseSource
> > > Web: http://www.fusesource.com
> > > Blog: http://sully6768.blogspot.com
> > > Twitter: sully6768
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Scott England-Sullivan
> ----------------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://www.fusesource.com
> Blog: http://sully6768.blogspot.com
> Twitter: sully6768
>
