Chris,
I should be able to have something ready to go in with the next set of
updates. I will let you know when it is completed.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Christian Müller <
christian.muel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is at least "my" requirement.
>
> Sent from a mobile device
> Am 07.08.2012 18:47 schrieb "Scott England-Sullivan" <sully6...@gmail.com
> >:
>
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > It sounds like you are looking for something like the following:
> >
> > from("sjms:consumer?transacted=true&batch=100")
> > .processor("do stuff")
> > to("file:output");
> >
> > Such that 100 messages would be consumed, processed and filed followed by
> > the session either being committed or rolled back based on the success or
> > fail of all 100 exchanges.
> >
> > Sound about right?
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Thomas Johansen <thxm...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not sure what this implies, Scott.
> > >
> > > My use case is to have a transaction started on a first exchange, and
> > then
> > > have X exhanges on the same transaction. It should first be committed
> > when
> > > some external event happens, like a control message is seen (possibly
> > from
> > > a separate control queue), after X number of messages or something. I'm
> > > sure Camel provides some options for mechanisms to use here? In my
> case I
> > > need to aggregate X records into a single file.
> > >
> > > Thomas
> > >
> > >
> > > Den 7. aug. 2012 kl. 14:50 skrev Scott England-Sullivan <
> > > sully6...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > I will take a look at it tonight. Plan is to add batch support by
> > having
> > > > the Producer and Consumer endpoints support a List of Messages. Once
> > in
> > > > place TX would be automatically supported as it is called as a
> > > > Synchronization upon completion of the Exchange.
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Christian Müller <
> > > > christian.muel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1
> > > >> Would like to see this feature too...
> > > >>
> > > >> Sent from a mobile device
> > > >> Am 07.08.2012 10:49 schrieb "Thomas Johansen" <thxm...@gmail.com>:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> As I understand the JMSComponent/ActiveMQComponent cannot support
> > > batched
> > > >>> transactions due to the use of Spring's DMLC. With this new
> > > SJMSComponent
> > > >>> there should be possibilities to implement this, I guess?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> BR,
> > > >>> Thomas
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > --
> > > > Scott England-Sullivan
> > > > ----------------------------------
> > > > FuseSource
> > > > Web: http://www.fusesource.com
> > > > Blog: http://sully6768.blogspot.com
> > > > Twitter: sully6768
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Scott England-Sullivan
> > ----------------------------------
> > FuseSource
> > Web: http://www.fusesource.com
> > Blog: http://sully6768.blogspot.com
> > Twitter: sully6768
> >
>
--
--
Scott England-Sullivan
----------------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://www.fusesource.com
Blog: http://sully6768.blogspot.com
Twitter: sully6768
