Thanks, much appreciated.
Best,
Christian
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Scott England-Sullivan
<sully6...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Chris,
>
> I should be able to have something ready to go in with the next set of
> updates. I will let you know when it is completed.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Christian Müller <
> christian.muel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is at least "my" requirement.
> >
> > Sent from a mobile device
> > Am 07.08.2012 18:47 schrieb "Scott England-Sullivan" <
> sully6...@gmail.com
> > >:
> >
> > > Hi Thomas,
> > >
> > > It sounds like you are looking for something like the following:
> > >
> > > from("sjms:consumer?transacted=true&batch=100")
> > > .processor("do stuff")
> > > to("file:output");
> > >
> > > Such that 100 messages would be consumed, processed and filed followed
> by
> > > the session either being committed or rolled back based on the success
> or
> > > fail of all 100 exchanges.
> > >
> > > Sound about right?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Thomas Johansen <thxm...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm not sure what this implies, Scott.
> > > >
> > > > My use case is to have a transaction started on a first exchange, and
> > > then
> > > > have X exhanges on the same transaction. It should first be committed
> > > when
> > > > some external event happens, like a control message is seen (possibly
> > > from
> > > > a separate control queue), after X number of messages or something.
> I'm
> > > > sure Camel provides some options for mechanisms to use here? In my
> > case I
> > > > need to aggregate X records into a single file.
> > > >
> > > > Thomas
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Den 7. aug. 2012 kl. 14:50 skrev Scott England-Sullivan <
> > > > sully6...@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > > I will take a look at it tonight. Plan is to add batch support by
> > > having
> > > > > the Producer and Consumer endpoints support a List of Messages.
> Once
> > > in
> > > > > place TX would be automatically supported as it is called as a
> > > > > Synchronization upon completion of the Exchange.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thoughts?
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Christian Müller <
> > > > > christian.muel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> +1
> > > > >> Would like to see this feature too...
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Sent from a mobile device
> > > > >> Am 07.08.2012 10:49 schrieb "Thomas Johansen" <thxm...@gmail.com
> >:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Hi,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> As I understand the JMSComponent/ActiveMQComponent cannot support
> > > > batched
> > > > >>> transactions due to the use of Spring's DMLC. With this new
> > > > SJMSComponent
> > > > >>> there should be possibilities to implement this, I guess?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> BR,
> > > > >>> Thomas
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > --
> > > > > Scott England-Sullivan
> > > > > ----------------------------------
> > > > > FuseSource
> > > > > Web: http://www.fusesource.com
> > > > > Blog: http://sully6768.blogspot.com
> > > > > Twitter: sully6768
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > --
> > > Scott England-Sullivan
> > > ----------------------------------
> > > FuseSource
> > > Web: http://www.fusesource.com
> > > Blog: http://sully6768.blogspot.com
> > > Twitter: sully6768
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Scott England-Sullivan
> ----------------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://www.fusesource.com
> Blog: http://sully6768.blogspot.com
> Twitter: sully6768
>
--
