Hi Ian,

> The original project has not been maintained for more than a year.
> ...
> I have tried to contact Dejan to get his input in this regard.
> ...
>  I am happy to collaborate with the original author but it might be simpler 
> to work of the branch

In my opinion core Camel components should be dependent only on the
stable 3rd party libraries. We violated this rule in the case of the
CSV [1] data format and once I run into some production issues at the
client site for this reason. Keeping local fork of the library in the
component is not the way to go, if you ask me.

I propose the following - try to settle an agreement with the Scomp
team. If in collaboration with the Scomp guys you could release new
version of the library, then use it in the Camel component. If not
(i.e. Scomp team explicitly tells you that the project will not be
released anymore), then fork Scomp on GitHub, fix it and distribute
your Camel component with your library.

Does it sound reasonable?

[1] http://camel.apache.org/csv.html

--
Henryk Konsek
http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com

Reply via email to