JB, I have used EasyMock in the past and that's fine if that's what this project has standardized upon, but I must suggest we take a look at Mockito. I was recently turned on to Mockito and it really puts the "easy" in EasyMock (something they neglected to do I guess :).
James On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > Hi James, > > it sounds good to me. I would advice Easymock. > > Regards > JB > > > On 10/04/2013 03:06 PM, James Carman wrote: >> >> As opposed to using a real HazelcastInstance, I would like to change >> the tests to use mock objects (using Mockito or something). There is >> no real reason to use a live, running Hazelcast instance in a unit >> test and it makes the unit tests very slow. Perhaps having a couple >> of tests that test the integration would be fine, but having every >> single test running against a real Hazelcast instance is just too time >> consuming. Thoughts? >> >> James >> > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com
