Hy guys, I'm a bit late... I'm also fine with both, Mockito and EasyMock, but would also prefer if we only use one of both in intermediate-term. I think it's easier to maintain only one over the time...
Best, Christian ----------------- Software Integration Specialist Apache Camel committer: https://camel.apache.org/team V.P. Apache Camel: https://www.apache.org/foundation/ Apache Member: https://www.apache.org/foundation/members.html https://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-mueller/11/551/642 On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>wrote: > Thanks to you ! > > I will take a look to "replace" Easymock by Mockito in other tests. > > Regards > JB > > > On 10/04/2013 03:52 PM, James Carman wrote: > >> JIRA created: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/CAMEL-6826<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6826> >> >> I'll work on a patch this evening and attach it. Thanks for the input, >> JB! >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Fair enough, yes. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> >>> On 10/04/2013 03:44 PM, James Carman wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> By the way, I just did a quick search and mockito is found all over >>>> the place in the codebase, so I would guess it's okay. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:41 AM, James Carman < >>>> ja...@carmanconsulting.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> I agree that we should try to standardize, but it is only a >>>>> test-scoped dependency, so it's not like you'll put a burden on user >>>>> code. Do we really think that in order for one component to use >>>>> Mockito that we have to change everyone else? If it's not that >>>>> pervasive, it's not a big deal, but could be a nightmare if it is. >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> jbono...@apache.org >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >