Hy guys, I'm a bit late...

I'm also fine with both, Mockito and EasyMock, but would also prefer if we
only use one of both in intermediate-term. I think it's easier to maintain
only one over the time...

Best,

Christian
-----------------

Software Integration Specialist

Apache Camel committer: https://camel.apache.org/team
V.P. Apache Camel: https://www.apache.org/foundation/
Apache Member: https://www.apache.org/foundation/members.html

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-mueller/11/551/642


On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>wrote:

> Thanks to you !
>
> I will take a look to "replace" Easymock by Mockito in other tests.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 10/04/2013 03:52 PM, James Carman wrote:
>
>> JIRA created:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/CAMEL-6826<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6826>
>>
>> I'll work on a patch this evening and attach it.  Thanks for the input,
>> JB!
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Fair enough, yes.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/04/2013 03:44 PM, James Carman wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> By the way, I just did a quick search and mockito is found all over
>>>> the place in the codebase, so I would guess it's okay.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:41 AM, James Carman <
>>>> ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree that we should try to standardize, but it is only a
>>>>> test-scoped dependency, so it's not like you'll put a burden on user
>>>>> code.  Do we really think that in order for one component to use
>>>>> Mockito that we have to change everyone else?  If it's not that
>>>>> pervasive, it's not a big deal, but could be a nightmare if it is.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbono...@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>

Reply via email to