Cool. We have to have an eye on the build time, because we add new components and tests in each release which is increasing it...
Best, Christian ----------------- Software Integration Specialist Apache Camel committer: https://camel.apache.org/team V.P. Apache Camel: https://www.apache.org/foundation/ Apache Member: https://www.apache.org/foundation/members.html https://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-mueller/11/551/642 On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:07 PM, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>wrote: > Agreed, Christian. There are more references to Mockito in the > codebase than there are EasyMock. Given that trend, I'm thinking I'll > write up a patch with Mockito. > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Christian Müller > <christian.muel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hy guys, I'm a bit late... > > > > I'm also fine with both, Mockito and EasyMock, but would also prefer if > we > > only use one of both in intermediate-term. I think it's easier to > maintain > > only one over the time... > > > > Best, > > > > Christian > > ----------------- > > > > Software Integration Specialist > > > > Apache Camel committer: https://camel.apache.org/team > > V.P. Apache Camel: https://www.apache.org/foundation/ > > Apache Member: https://www.apache.org/foundation/members.html > > > > https://www.linkedin.com/pub/christian-mueller/11/551/642 > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net > >wrote: > > > >> Thanks to you ! > >> > >> I will take a look to "replace" Easymock by Mockito in other tests. > >> > >> Regards > >> JB > >> > >> > >> On 10/04/2013 03:52 PM, James Carman wrote: > >> > >>> JIRA created: > >>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/CAMEL-6826< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-6826> > >>> > >>> I'll work on a patch this evening and attach it. Thanks for the input, > >>> JB! > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Fair enough, yes. > >>>> > >>>> Regards > >>>> JB > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 10/04/2013 03:44 PM, James Carman wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> By the way, I just did a quick search and mockito is found all over > >>>>> the place in the codebase, so I would guess it's okay. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:41 AM, James Carman < > >>>>> ja...@carmanconsulting.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I agree that we should try to standardize, but it is only a > >>>>>> test-scoped dependency, so it's not like you'll put a burden on user > >>>>>> code. Do we really think that in order for one component to use > >>>>>> Mockito that we have to change everyone else? If it's not that > >>>>>> pervasive, it's not a big deal, but could be a nightmare if it is. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >>>> jbono...@apache.org > >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >>>> > >>> > >> -- > >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >> jbono...@apache.org > >> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >> >
