Hi

Ah camel-quarkus likely haven't updated and removed outdated releases.
Its latest release is 2.2.0, which should be there instead of 2.0.0.
The 2.0.0 should be removed.

On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 4:38 AM David Jencks <david.a.jen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So camel-quarkus latest referring to camel components 3.11.x seems 
> reasonable.  What about camel-quarkus 2.0.0?
>
> Now I noticed some more problems….
>
> I can’t figure out what the meaning of the camel-quarkus version is.  What 
> does the `2.0.0` in the non-latest version refer to?  What about `latest`?
>
> This is reflected in these pages….
>
> (1) https://camel.apache.org/camel-quarkus/2.0.0/reference/components.html
> (2) https://camel.apache.org/camel-quarkus/2.0.0/reference/dataformats.html
> (3) https://camel.apache.org/camel-quarkus/2.0.0/reference/languages.html
> (4) https://camel.apache.org/camel-quarkus/2.0.0/reference/others.html
>
> the tables are constructed by attempting to query some parts of the main 
> camel components component.  1, 3, and 4 query at version `2.0.0` which, not 
> existing, produces no results. 2 queries at version `latest`
>
> Some of the attributes used in these queries should be in the antora.yml 
> component descriptor, but I’d like to understand what the correct values are 
> before putting them there.
>
> David Jencks
>
> > On Sep 18, 2021, at 12:31 AM, Zoran Regvart <zo...@regvart.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi David & Cameleers,
> > as far as I’m aware, all sub-projects lag behind the latest Camel version. 
> > I don’t know if that’s a problem, they usually are not very far behind.
> > For the documentation and Camel Quarkus in particular, the past experience 
> > was that pointing to the latest Camel version often led to broken links so 
> > not changing the version led to greater stability of the website.
> > I do think that documentation should be cross linked against the correct 
> > versions, i.e. the ones they depend on in the code and that version should 
> > be prominently displayed in the documentation.
> >
> > zoran
> > --
> > Sent from mobile
> >
> >> On 16. Sep 2021, at 22:10, David Jencks <david.a.jen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> While fixing the broken camel-quarkus partial website build I noticed a 
> >> couple of things I don’t understand.
> >>
> >> 1. camel-quarkus latest seems to use camel 3.11.x, at least the docs do.  
> >> I think that, if this is really correct, the camel-quarkus index page 
> >> should prominently say that you aren’t getting the cutting-edge latest 
> >> camel in camel-quarkus, but something slightly older.  Naively, I expected 
> >> camel-quarkus versions to track camel versions.  Indicating the 
> >> relationship between versions would certainly help me.
> >>
> >> 2. eips are now versioned with components, but at least some links from 
> >> components to eips use {eip-vc} in  
> >> xref:{eip-vc}:eips:polling-consumer.adoc[Polling Consumer]
> >> which points to the latest eips.  If camel-quarkus really intentionally 
> >> depends on camel 3.11.x then it should be possible to build the partial 
> >> website with only the 3.11.x  versions, but I get lots of errors like
> >>
> >> [ERROR] [12:44:05.727] ERROR (asciidoctor): target of xref not found: 
> >> latest@components:eips:polling-consumer.adoc
> >> [ERROR]     file: 
> >> docs/components/modules/ROOT/pages/beanstalk-component.adoc
> >> [ERROR]     source: https://github.com/apache/camel.git (refname: 
> >> camel-3.11.x, start path: docs/components)
> >>
> >> I think there are 22 such usages, involving all links in the `components` 
> >> component to eips.
> >>
> >> If we agree this is a problem I’ll prepare some PRs for the affected 
> >> branches (presumably at least main and 3.11.x)
> >>
> >>
> >> David Jencks
> >>
> >> side note: The camel-quarkus index page (both latest and 2.0.0) says
> >> Camel Quarkus also takes advantage of the many performance improvements 
> >> made in Camel 3, which results in a lower memory footprint, less reliance 
> >> on reflection (which is good for native application support) and faster 
> >> startup times.
> >> I’m bewildered by this, and want to know “compared with what?”.  I also 
> >> think it would be nice if there was an explanation of what is different 
> >> between the latest and 2.0.0 versions of camel-quarkus, right on the index 
> >> page.
> >>
> >>
>


-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2

Reply via email to